Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2023 Jan 5;268:119863. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119863

Table 5.

Results of three image-level domain adaptation methods on T1-weighted MRIs of five traveling phantom subjects acquired by three different scanners from the ABCD dataset.

Source Domain→Target Domain (Subject ID) Method CC PSNR MSE
G→Siemens (Phantom-2, Phantom-3) Baseline 0.4889±0.0081 21.4143± 2.8718 0.0080± 0.0049
HM 0.5642±0.0395 22.3131± 2.5975 0.0064± 0.0037
SSIMH 0.5935±0.0221 22.7624± 2.5310 0.0057± 0.0032
Philips→iemens Baseline 0.5408±0.0194 18.7578± 0.8847 0.0135± 0.0028
(Phantom-4, Phantom-5) HM 0.5495±0.0388 18.7477± 1.1303 0.0135± 0.0035
SSIMH 0.6098±0.0269 20.1269± 1.8421 0.0101± 0.0042
GE→Philips (Phantom-1) Baseline 0.4682 21.3915 0.0073
HM 0.5108 21.2482 0.0075
SSIMH 0.5570 22.6421 0.0054