Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 26;14:1110541. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1110541

Table 2.

TcdA neutralizing potency and efficacy of VHH constructs.

Antibody Linker TcdA inhibition
IC50 (nM) IC99 (nM)a Efficacy (%)b
A20 na
A26 na 52.6 ± 3.2 719 88.1 ± 1.7
A20-A20 [GS]6 174.5 ± 12.5 2,123 84.9 ± 2.4
A26-A26 [GS]6 39.0 ± 2.9 1,189 89.1 ± 2.1
A20-A26 [GS]6 0.16 ± 0.01 0.27 93.8 ± 1.0
A26-A20 [GS]6 49.7 ± 9.1 7,866 85.3 ± 4.2
CDA1 IgG na 30.0 ± 8.1 3,342 77.5 ± 6.2
A20-A26 (G4S) [G4S] 0.22 ± 0.02 0.54 85.1 ± 1.2
A20-A26 (G4S)2 [G4S]2 0.23 ± 0.02 0.42 87.7 ± 1.1
A20-A26 (G4S)3 [G4S]3 0.29 ± 0.02 0.46 93.5 ± 0.8

Vero cell cytotoxicity assays measuring mean ± SD TcdA inhibition after 72 h, from three technical replicates, shown in Figures 3B,C. na, not applicable; −, lack of neutralization activity (at 100 nM VHH concentration). aCalculated from mean IC50 value and Hill slope. bMaximum level of TcdA inhibition.