TABLE 2:
Author year Country |
Aim | Method Data collection Analytical approach |
Setting | Participants Age (n) |
Relationship status | Ethnic origin | Education/Vocational training | Contribution to findingsa 1 2 3 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sylvest et al. 2018 Denmark |
To explore how attending a fertility assessment influenced women’s family planning decisions |
Individual interviews Qualitative content analysis |
Women interviewed one year after an individual fertility counselling at a Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic |
20 women 35–40 years |
Single 5 Cohabiting 15 |
Not reported |
Longb 16 Mediumb 3 Shortb 1 |
X X– – |
Birch Petersen et al. 2016 Denmark |
To explore attitudes towards family formation and potential differences between single and cohabiting women |
Individual interviews Qualitative content analysis |
Women with no known fertility problems who attended a Fertility Assessment and Counselling Clinic for assessment and counselling on future fertility |
20 women ≥ 34 years |
Single 10 Cohabiting 10 |
Not reported |
Longb 16 Mediumb 3 Shortb 1 |
X X X X |
Ngyuen 2016 USA |
To examine how relationship status impact motherhood motivation |
Individual interviews Qualitative data analysis |
College-educatedc aspiring professional women without children but with a desire for children in the future |
12 women 30–34 years |
Single 7 Married 3 Divorced 1 Engaged 1 |
Hispanic 2 Caucasian 6 Asian american 3 Africa american 1 |
BA 2 MA 8 PhD 1 JD 1 |
X X X X |
Lavender et al. 2015 UK |
To gain an understanding of women’s views surrounding decisions on the timing of childbearing |
Individual interviews Thematic analysis |
Young, educated women, women at an age when they are most likely to begin childbearing, and women in the category of advanced maternal age |
18 women 18–24 years (6) 25–34 years (6) ≥ 35 years (6) |
Single 9 Partner 4 Married 5 |
White British 17 White European 1 |
A level 2 Degree 12 PhD 1 GCSE 1 Masters 1 College 1 |
X X X X |
Eriksson et al. 2013 Sweden |
To gain a more comprehensive understanding of how young, highly educated women and men c without children, who had started professional careers, reflect on fertility and postponed parenthood |
Individual interviews Content analysis |
College-educatedc participants between 24 and 38 years of age who had started a professional career and had not yet had children |
22 women 25–38 years |
Single 6 Cohabiting 10 Married 6 |
Not reported | College 22 | X X – X |
Eriksson et al. 2012 Sweden |
To gain a deeper understanding of how highly educated women and mend without children reflect on having children in the future |
Individual interviews Content analysis |
College-educated c participants from three university towns, who had started their professional careers at a workplace where the majority of the staff were also college educated |
22 women 25–38 years |
Single 6 Cohabiting 10 Married 6 |
Not reported | College 22 | X X – X |
Cooke et al. 2012 UK |
To gain an understanding of factors influencing women’s decisions to delay childbearing |
In depth semi-structured interviews Hermeneutic thematic analysis |
Non-pregnant women with no children, women pregnant with their first child, and women with no children attending a fertility clinic e |
6 women ≥ 35 years |
Single 2 Partner 1 Married 3 |
Not reported |
School/College 1 Degree 4 Masters or above 1 |
X X X X |
Söderberg et al. 2011 Sweden |
To describe fertility experiences of young women who had not been pregnant or become mothers |
Individual interviews Phenomeno-logical analysis |
Women who visited an outpatient clinic for contraceptive counseling |
10 women 23–27 years |
Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | X X X – |
aOverall theme: Timing of motherhood. Subthemes: (1) Making a life-changing decision, (2) The right time, (3) Fear of regret, and (4) Plan B
bLong: Four years or more of vocational training, Medium: 2–3 years of vocational training, Short: One year or less of vocational training.
cAt least 4 years of university education/bachelor's degree.
dMen’s views were clearly separated and left out of the analysis of this meta-synthesis.
eOnly non-pregnant women were included in the analysis of this meta-synthesis.