TABLE 2.
GSEA rank list for EMT gene sets.
Term | ES | NES | p-value | FDR | FWER |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PMID29212455: Wang_et_al. 2017 | 0.5657 | 2.3413 | 0.0000 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
PMID25744723: Schliekelman_et_al. 2015 | 0.4556 | 2.2449 | 0.0000 | 0.0005 | 0.001 |
PMID30728376: Soo Min_et_al. 2019 | 0.5228 | 2.2231 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | 0.001 |
PMID24510113: Reka_et_al. 2014 | 0.7297 | 2.2166 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | 0.001 |
PMID29346386: Hollern_et_al. 2018 | 0.5984 | 2.2083 | 0.0000 | 0.0002 | 0.001 |
PMID20713713: Taube_et_al. 2010 | 0.6191 | 2.1953 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.001 |
PMID23734191: Zarkoob_et_al. 2013 | 0.6186 | 2.1953 | 0.0000 | 0.0002 | 0.001 |
PMID19340593: Joyce_et_al. 2009 | 0.6535 | 2.184 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.001 |
PMID25214461: Tuan_et_al. 2014 | 0.594 | 2.175 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.001 |
PMID29700419: Liang_et_al. 2018 | 0.6864 | 2.1655 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 | 0.002 |
Note: EMT gene sets were acquired from the EMTome website, and GSEA was performed between the high-risk and low-risk groups. FDR <0.05 was considered significantly different in gene set enrichment between the two groups.