| •◊ lignocellulosic energy crops already used for energy production—internal EU28 |
† permanent crops |
| ◊ lignocellulosic energy crops converted from other land use types—internal EU28 |
| |
|
| ◊ clear-cut—internal EU28 and imported into the EU28 through trade |
° clear-cut |
| |
|
| ◊ retention system—internal EU28 |
° retention |
| |
|
| ◊ plantations for energywood already used for energy production—imported into the EU28 through trade |
° timber plantation and plantation
for pulpwood
and fuelwood |
| ◊ timber plantation and plantation for pulpwood—imported into the EU28 through trade |
| ◊ plantations for energywood converted from other land use types—imported into the EU28 through trade |
| |
|
| ◊ selection system—internal EU28 and imported into the EU28 through trade |
° selection system (temperate and boreal) |
| |
|
| ◊ reduced impact logging or RIL—imported into the EU28 through trade |
° reduced
impact logging or RIL (tropical) |
| |
|
| • low-intensity managed forest |
° merging of selective logging, selection system and retention |
| |
|
| • high-intensity managed forest |
° merging of clear-cut, timber plantations, nontimber plantations, and plantations for fuelwood
and pulp |
| |
|
| • forest regrowth |
■ secondary forest |
| the response ratios for
this category were obtained by combining
the results of a meta-analysis on biodiversity response in secondary
forests57 and the modeling framework applied
therein with the model defined in a more recent study on recovery
trajectories58 (see S6 for details). |