Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 5;14:87–99. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S392875

Table 2.

Students’ Agreement on Influence of Active Engagement in the Development of Capabilities

Statements Programs Analysis
CLAB OT RAD RT
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) x2 Sig
Developed ability to make judgements 13(45) 26(63) 25(76) 35(83) 13.06 0.005
Become more willing to consider different points of view 15(52) 30(73) 25(76) 38(90) 13.62 0.003
Encouraged to use my own initiative 15(52) 26(63) 25(76) 36(86) 10.98 0.012
Challenged to come up with new ideas 18(62) 27(66) 24(73) 31(74) 1.51 0.680
Take the responsibility of my own learning 17(59) 27(66) 25(76) 39(93) 12.93 0.005
More confident of my ability to pursue further learning 18(62) 26(63) 27(82) 39(93) 13.75 0.003
Learned how to be to be more adaptable 16(55) 27(66) 26(79) 39(93) 15.08 0.002
More willing to change views and accept new ideas 14(48) 25(61) 25(76) 35(83) 11.61 0.009
Improved ability to use knowledge to solve problems in field of study 14(48) 28(68) 27(82) 41(98) 24.83 <0.001
Able to bring information and different ideas to solve problems 12(41) 27(66) 27(82) 33(79) 14.65 0.002
Developed the ability to efficiently communicate with others 14(48) 27(66) 24(73) 38(90) 15.59 <0.001
Improved ability to convey ideas 15(52) 29(71) 26(79) 35(83) 9.45 0.024
Learned to be an effective team or group member 15(52) 27(66) 22(67) 41(98) 21.00 <0.001
Feel confident about the way I deal with a wide range of people 15(52) 24(59) 25(76) 34(81) 9.29 0.026
Feel confident in using computer applications when necessary 11(38) 24(59) 24(73) 36(86) 18.99 <0.001
Learned more about using computers for presenting information 14(48) 28(68) 23(70) 37(88) 13.20 <0.004
Our teaching staff use a variety of teaching methods 12(41) 17(41) 25(76) 34(81) 21.25 <0.001
Students are given the chance to participate in classes 13(45) 27(66) 27(82) 38(90) 20.25 <0.001
The teaching staff try hard to help us understand the course material 13(45) 25(61) 25(76) 41(98) 26.83 <0.001
The course design helps us to understand the course content 15(52) 14(34) 26(79) 37(88) 31.25 <0.001
The explanations provided by the teaching staff is useful 17(59) 23(56) 25(76) 40(95) 19.36 <0.001
There is sufficient feedback on activities and assignments 14(48) 15(37) 22(67) 34(81) 19.00 <0.001
The program uses a variety of assessment methods 13(45) 20(49) 25(76) 39(93) 26.41 <0.001
To do well in assessment you need to have good analysis skills 17(59) 24(59) 22(67) 33(79) 4.69 0.195
The assessment tested understanding of key concepts 14(48) 24(59) 23(70) 37(88) 14.60 0.002
The communication between teaching staff and students is good 15(52) 16(39) 25(76) 42(100) 39.75 <0.001
Teaching staff helpful when asked questions 15(52) 19(46) 26(79) 37(88) 21.47 <0.001
Manage to complete the requirements without feeling unduly stressed 16(55) 12(29) 23(70) 27(64) 15.16 0.002
The amount of work is quite reasonable 14(48) 15(37) 23(70) 30(71) 13.56 0.004
Feel a strong sense of belonging to my class group 16(55) 23(56) 26(79) 37(88) 14.66 0.002
Frequently work together with other in my classes 16(55) 25(61) 25(76) 33(79) 6.22 0.102
Frequently discussed ideas from courses with students out-of-class 14(48) 18(44) 22(67) 34(81) 14.44 0.002
Discussing course material with other students has helped in a better understanding 13(45) 18(44) 19(58) 30(71) 7.93 0.048
Courses fitted together to make a coherent program of study 12(41) 17(41) 23(70) 31(74) 13.95 0.003
The program of study for my major was well integrated 13(45) 18(44) 23(70) 35(83) 18.14 <0.001

Notes: Kember D, Leung D. Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learn Environ Resear. 2009;1:15–29. Springer Nature.16