Table 3.
Logistic regression models of youth offending prevalence for early 1990s and early 2010s subsample (n=90,711)
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed Effects | ||
| Survey period (1=2011–15, 0=1991–95) | −.565 *** | −.322 *** |
| (.002) | (.016) | |
| Grade | −.203 *** | −.406 *** |
| (.007) | (.006) | |
| Black | .158 | .300 *** |
| (.109) | (.093) | |
| Other | .263 *** | .348 *** |
| (.060) | (.093) | |
| Sex | .543 *** | .360 *** |
| (.141) | (.089) | |
| Single parent | .271 *** | .106 *** |
| (.041) | (.053) | |
| Parental education | −.059 *** | −.012 |
| (.022) | (.028) | |
| Moderate work | .189 *** | |
| (.025) | ||
| Intensive work | .212 *** | |
| (.010) | ||
| Unstructured socializing | .102 *** | |
| (.017) | ||
| Alcohol frequency | .441 *** | |
| (.004) | ||
| College graduation expectation | −.270 *** | |
| (.016) | ||
| Community involvement | −.054 *** | |
| (.013) | ||
| School attachment | −.266 *** | |
| (.014) | ||
| Parental supervision | −.113 *** | |
| (.010) | ||
| Sensation seeking | .729 *** | |
| (.019) | ||
| Constant | −.047 | .812 *** |
| (.126) | (.187) |
p<.05
p<.01
p<.001