Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Electronics (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;12(2):467. doi: 10.3390/electronics12020467

Table 4.

The performance results of different 2D and 3D CNN models on PET image.

Model Acc AUC F1 Precision Recall AP
3D-CNN [14] 0.8482 0.8797 0.8095 0.8151 0.8041 0.7339
2D-CNN [17] 0.8241 0.8446 0.8069 0.7778 0.8383 0.7229
Jo et al. [15] 0.8451 0.8649 0.8162 0.8506 0.7844 0.7618
Hybrid [19] 0.8714 0.8654 0.8537 0.8512 0.8563 0.7919
Max. 0.8583 0.8787 0.8333 0.8599 0.8084 0.7791
Avg. 0.8661 0.8904 0.8440 0.8625 0.8263 0.7888
ARP [24] 0.8609 0.8811 0.8349 0.8701 0.8024 0.7848
LWP(current study) 0.8871 0.9088 0.8693 0.8827 0.8563 0.8189