Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0273224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273224

Reference gene expression stability within the rat brain under mild intermittent ketosis induced by supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides

Alexander P Schwarz 1,*,#, Veronika A Nikitina 2,#, Darya U Krytskaya 2, Ksenia P Shcherbakova 2, Alexander N Trofimov 2,*
Editor: Dragan Hrncic3
PMCID: PMC9910642  PMID: 36757952

Abstract

Reverse transcription followed by quantitative (real-time) polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has become the gold standard in mRNA expression analysis. However, it requires an accurate choice of reference genes for adequate normalization. The aim of this study was to validate the reference genes for qPCR experiments in the brain of rats in the model of mild ketosis established through supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) and intermittent fasting. This approach allows to reproduce certain neuroprotective effects of the classical ketogenic diet while avoiding its adverse effects. Ketogenic treatment targets multiple metabolic pathways, which may affect the reference gene expression. The standard chow of adult Wistar rats was supplemented with MCT (2 ml/kg orogastrically, during 6 h of fasting) or water (equivolume) for 1 month. The mRNA expression of 9 housekeeping genes (Actb, B2m, Gapdh, Hprt1, Pgk1, Ppia, Rpl13a, Sdha, Ywhaz) in the medial prefrontal cortex, dorsal and ventral hippocampus was measured by RT-qPCR. Using the RefFinder® online tool, we have found that the reference gene stability ranking strongly depended on the analyzed brain region. The most stably expressed reference genes were found to be Ppia, Actb, and Rpl13a in the medial prefrontal cortex; Rpl13a, Ywhaz, and Pgk1 in the dorsal hippocampus; Ywhaz, Sdha, and Ppia in the ventral hippocampus. The B2m was identified as an invalid reference gene in the ventral hippocampus, while Sdha, Actb, and Gapdh were unstable in the dorsal hippocampus. The stabilities of the examined reference genes were lower in the dorsal hippocampus compared to the ventral hippocampus and the medial prefrontal cortex. When normalized to the three most stably expressed reference genes, the Gapdh mRNA was upregulated, while the Sdha mRNA was downregulated in the medial prefrontal cortex of MCT-fed animals. Thus, the expression stability of reference genes strongly depends on the examined brain regions. The dorsal and ventral hippocampal areas differ in reference genes stability rankings, which should be taken into account in the RT-qPCR experimental design.

Introduction

Reverse transcription followed by quantitative (real-time) polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is known to be a gold standard in low throughput mRNA expression analysis. However, it requires an accurate choice of reference genes for normalization to obtain reliable results. Recent findings show that reference gene stability may be affected by the experimental design [1]. The choice of an unstable reference gene for RT-qPCR data normalization could conceal changes of target mRNA levels or erroneously reveal irrelevant effects of experimental treatments [28]. The MIQE (minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments) guidelines require experimental determination of the choice of optimal reference genes with clear validation of their stability within the reported experimental conditions [9].

We have recently developed a set of multiplex qPCR assays allowing fast expression of nine housekeeping genes in just 3 reactions [10]. Gapdh, Actb, Ppia, B2m, Hprt1, Ywhaz, Rpl13a, Pgk1, Sdha genes selected for analysis are widely used as reference in RT-qPCR experiments in brain tissues or brain-derived cell lines in laboratory rats and have shown higher or lower stability depending on experimental settings [1]. These genes participate in different cell functions (glucose and energy metabolism, protein folding, protein synthesis, purine synthesis, signaling, antigen presentation, cytoskeleton building; see S1 Table) to minimize possible co-regulation effects, which could impact the analysis results.

In the present work, we aim to evaluate the expression stability of 9 housekeeping genes widely used as reference and select suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis within the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in the rat model of mild ketosis induced by medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) supplementation. MCT supplementation is considered a promising approach to mimic the neuroprotective effects of the classic ketogenic diet without its adverse effects [11, 12] and has been shown to affect the expression of neuroplasticity-related genes [13] and exert effects in the brain in a region-specific manner [14].

Materials and methods

Animals and study design

The study was performed on 9 m.o. male Wistar rats weighed 444 ± 69 g (M ± SD). Animal experiments were carried out under the Guidelines on the Treatment of Laboratory Animals effective at the Institute of Experimental Medicine (St. Petersburg, Russia), and these guidelines comply with EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. Experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical committee of the Institute of Experimental Medicine (protocol no. 2/22).

Experimental animals were housed under standard conditions with 12 h light-dark cycle (lights on at 5 AM) and ad libitum access to water. The study design is summarized in Fig 1. Rats were given MCT (Jarrow Formulas, Inc., Los Angeles CA, USA) at a dose of 2 ml/kg daily by oral gavage during a 6-hour fasting period or an equivolume of water without fasting (control animals) for 4 weeks. Adjusted for metabolic rate [15], this dosage corresponds to approximately 20 g/day of MCT for an adult human subject, a typical dose used in human studies [16]. Animals were sacrificed by decapitation. Brains were quickly collected, frozen, and stored at -70°C for further analysis.

Fig 1. The design of the study aimed to assess the effect of mild ketosis on the reference gene expression stability in the rat brain.

Fig 1

MCT (2 ml/kg body weight) were given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. mRNA expression of nine housekeeping genes (Actb, Gapdh, B2m, Rpl13a, Sdha, Ppia, Hprt1, Pgk1, Ywhaz) in the medial prefrontal cortex, dorsal and hippocampal areas was measured by RT-qPCR.

Extraction of brain structures and total RNA isolation

Brains were placed into freezing microtome Thermo-scientific™ Microm HM525 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 60 min at -20°C and then cut in coronal direction. Medial prefrontal cortex, dorsal and ventral hippocampal regions were captured by microspatula, the structures determined based on the rat brain atlas [17], as described earlier [18]. Samples were homogenized in an appropriate volume of ExtractRNA reagent (Evrogen JSC, Moscow, Russia) and total RNA was extracted by single-step acid guanidinium-thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method [19] according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA purification

To purify the isolated RNA from possible genomic DNA contamination, the samples were treated with ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease (RQ1 DNase; Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA). The tubes with the previously precipitated RNA were centrifuged for 30 min at +4°C, 12,000 g, and the ethanol supernatant was removed. The pellet was dried using a dry-block thermostat TS-100 (Biosan, Riga, Latvia) for 5 min at +50°C. The dried pellet was resuspended in 7.5 μl of milli-Q water and incubated at +50°C for 5 min for better dissolution of nucleic acids. A reaction mixture containing 10 U of a recombinant RNasin Ribonuclease Inhibitor (Sileks, Moscow, Russia) and 2 U of RQ1 DNase in a 2× reaction buffer was added to the resulting solution. The tubes with the reaction mixture were incubated for 10 min at +37°С. After incubation, 1.5 μL (1/10 of the volume of the reaction mixture) of a stop reagent (20 mM EGTA) was added to the samples, mixed, incubated at +70°C to inactivate the enzyme for 5 min, followed by cooling to +4°C.

To purify the resulting preparation from the reaction components, RNA was precipitated: the volume of the solution was brought to 30 μL with milli-Q water, 3 μL (1/10 of the volume of RNA solution) of 3M sodium acetate solution, and 75 μL (2.5 volumes of RNA solution) of 96% ethanol, thoroughly mixed, and then incubated at –20°С overnight. After that, the tubes were centrifuged, the precipitate was washed with 75% ethanol and stored under alcohol until further handling.

RT-qPCR

Before carrying out the reverse transcription (RT) reaction, the tubes with RNA were centrifuged for 30 min at +4°C, 12,000 g, the RNA sediment was dried and then dissolved in 15 μL of milli-Q water. RNA concentration (determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm) and purity (determined by measuring the 260/230 and 260/280 nm absorbance ratios) were measured spectrophotometrically using a Nanodrop 2000 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). To carry out the RT reaction, 0.5 μg oligo(dT) and 0.25 μg random-9-mer primers (BioBeagle, St. Petersburg, Russia) were added to 8 μL of the RNA solution containing 1 μg of RNA preliminarily equalized in terms of concentration and incubated at + 70°С for 5 min. Samples were briefly cooled and centrifuged. Then a reaction mixture containing M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA), a mixture of dNTPs (25 mM dATP, 25 mM dCTP, 25 mM dGTP, 25 mM dTTP; Medigen, Novosibirsk, Russia), 5× M-MLV reaction buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl, 375 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 50 mM DL-dithiothreitol, pH 8.3; Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA), RNasin in deionized water was added. The samples were thoroughly vortexed and incubated for 2 h at +42°C for the synthesis of cDNA on the RNA template and for 10 min at +65°C to stop the reaction through enzyme inactivation. The resulting cDNA solution (20 μL) was diluted 5-fold with deionized water and stored at –20°C until real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with fluorescent probes (TaqMan technology).

In the present work, we tested a panel of 9 reference genes that regulate different cell functions and are frequently used for RT-qPCR data normalization in the rat brain [1]. We used three triplex qPCR assays validated in our previous work [10]: Actb+Gapdh+B2m; Rpl13a+Sdha+Ppia; Hprt1+Pgk1+Ywhaz. The descriptions of the used primer/probes are summarized in S1 Table.

The Multiplex qPCR reactions had been optimized and fully described in our previous study [10]. Briefly, the reaction mix contained 1 μL of cDNA sample, 0.75 U of TaqM-polymerase (Alkor Bio Group, St. Petersburg, Russia), 200 nM of specific forward and reverse primers, and either 200nM (for Actb) or 100 nM (for the rest of the genes) TaqMan probes, 3.5 mM MgCl2, 250 μM dATP/dTTP/dCTP/dGTP in 10 μL total volume of 1× TaqM-reaction buffer. All oligonucleotides were synthesized by DNA-Synthesis Ltd. (Moscow, Russia). All reactions were duplicated with no reverse transcription and no template control. The reactions were run on C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler combined with CFX96 Real-Time detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The thermal settings were as follows: 1 cycle at 95°C for 15 min (as recommended by the enzyme manufacturer), 5 cycles (without plate read) with a denaturation step (95°C for 5 s) and an annealing/elongation step (60°C for 10 s) and then 35 cycles with a denaturation step (95°C for 5 s) and an annealing/elongation step (60°C for 10 s) followed by fluorescence plate read (about 13 s). In a separate experiment, we tested the efficiencies of used assays with the same batch of reagents as the main experiment using serial dilution method. All assays show optimal efficiency (96.5%– 109.3%) and R2 (S4S6 Figs).

Gene stability analysis

The PCR curves were analyzed with the CFX Manager software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA): the quantification cycle (Cq) values were determined by setting a single threshold. We then imported the raw mean Cq data to RefFinder® online tool (https://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder/) to evaluate the expression stability of the examined genes. RefFinder® utilizes four commonly used algorithms for reference gene expression stability analysis (the comparative Delta-Ct method, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and GeNorm) and calculates comprehensive ranking by geometric averaging of obtained ranks [20, 21]. Briefly, (a) in the analysis by the comparative Delta-Ct method, selection of the most stable reference genes is achieved by comparing the relative expression of pairs of genes in each sample: genes with the smallest mean standard deviation of delta-Ct are considered the most stable [22]; (b) the BestKeeper tool selects the most stable genes by ranking the geometric means of raw Cq values of each gene, comparing them in pairs, and calculating the coefficient of variation, the standard deviation of the Cq values (the lower, the more stable), and the correlation coefficient (the higher, the more stable) [23]; (c) NormFinder’s principle of operation is based on a mathematical model that calculates the stability value of candidate reference genes by estimating both the total variation of the reference candidate genes and the variation between subgroups of samples in a sample set [24]; (d) the basic principle behind the GeNorm algorithm is to calculate the stability value M (the lower, the more stable) by averaging the pairwise variations among all candidate genes in all samples [25]. As we have used only assays with optimal efficiencies (S4S6 Figs), the data obtained by RefFinder should not be affected by biases in efficiency [26].

Gene expression analysis and statistics

The mRNA expression levels were assessed by 2-ΔΔCt method [27] using geometric mean of Cqs for the three most stable reference genes (based on ReFinder results) for normalization of the expression data [25]. Data were analyzed in GraphPad Prism, ver. 9. mRNA expression data was Log2-transformed for normalization. Shapiro-Wilk’s test was applied to evaluate normality of data distribution. Levene’s test was used to evaluate homogeneity of variances between groups. Student’s t-test (equal variance) or Welch corrected t-test (unequal variance) were used to compare group means. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The expression stability of nine reference genes (Actb, B2m, Gapdh, Hprt1, Pgk1, Ppia, Rpl13a, Sdha, Ywhaz) in several brain regions (medial prefrontal cortex, dorsal and ventral hippocampus) of rats in the model of mild ketosis was analyzed by RefFinder® online tool incorporating comparative Delta-Ct [22], BestKeeper [23], NormFinder [24], and GeNorm [25] algorithms. Stability values and rankings obtained by different methods are summarized in Figs 2 and 3, respectively. Detailed results are provided in S1S3 Figs. As can be seen in Fig 2, the stability values among the examined brain areas are proportionally quite similar regardless of the algorithm chosen for the analysis. Overall, the examined reference genes demonstrated the highest stability in the medial prefrontal cortex and the lowest stability in the dorsal hippocampus (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Reference gene stability values of each housekeeping gene obtained by four methods in three different brain regions of rats fed with MCT.

Fig 2

MCT (2 ml/kg body weight) were given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. Expression stability values of nine housekeeping genes (Actb, Gapdh, B2m, Rpl13a, Sdha, Ppia, Hprt1, Pgk1, Ywhaz, each represented by a dot per each brain structure) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC, circular dots), dorsal (DH, square dots) and ventral (VH, triangular dots) hippocampal areas were analyzed using (a) comparative Delta-Ct, (b) BestKeeper, (c) NormFinder, and (d) GeNorm methods. For GeNorm (D), values above 0.5 cut-off M-value indicate unstable genes inappropriate for RT-qPCR data normalization. Only eight M-values are presented because the GeNorm method calculates a single M-value for the pair of the most stable genes.

Fig 3. Reference gene stability rankings in three brain regions of rats fed with MCT.

Fig 3

MCT (2 ml/kg body weight) were given as a supplement to standard feed to adult animals (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while control rats received equivolume water. Reference gene stability in the (a) medial prefrontal cortex, (b) dorsal and (c) ventral hippocampal areas was analyzed by RefFinder® online tool. RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated in brackets under gene name on X-axis) is based on geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: comparative Delta-Ct, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and GeNorm. *–unstably expressed genes inappropriate for normalization, according to the GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value.

Medial prefrontal cortex

Actb, Rpl13a, and Ywhaz were found to be the most stable reference genes within the medial prefrontal cortex of rats subjected to mild ketosis, based on the RefFinder comprehensive ranking (Fig 3A). The B2m expression was the least stable. GeNorm identified Actb and Gapdh as the most stably expressed reference genes, while B2m and Sdha were identified as the least stable. GeNorm M-values for all genes were below 0.5 cut-off value. NormFinder found Ppia and Rpl13a to be the most stable, whereas B2m and Sdha were the least stable. According to the comparative Delta-Ct method, Rpl13a, Ppia, and Actb were the most stable, while B2m and Sdha were the least stable. BestKeeper identified Pgk1, Sdha, and Ywhaz as the most stably expressed and B2m as the least stably expressed.

Dorsal hippocampus

RefFinder comprehensive ranking identified Rpl13a, Ywhaz, Pgk1 as the most stable reference genes in the dorsal hippocampus, whereas Sdha expression was the least stable (Fig 3B). Rpl13a and Ywhaz were found to be the most stable according to GeNorm analysis, and Gapdh, Actb, and Sdha were identified as unstable and invalid reference genes (0.5 cut-off M-value). Rpl13a and Ywhaz were also found to be the most stable reference genes by NormFinder and comparative Delta-Ct algorithms, whereas Actb and Sdha expression was the least stable based on these methods. BestKeeper identified Pgk1 and Rpl13a as the most stable and B2m as the least stable.

Ventral hippocampus

Ywhaz, Sdha, and Ppia were most stably expressed in the ventral hippocampus, whereas Gapdh and B2m were the most unstable, based on RefFinder comprehensive ranking (Fig 3C). Ywhaz, Sdha, and Rpl13a were found to be the most stable, while Gapdh and B2m were found to be the least stable reference genes according to NormFinder and comparative Delta-Ct results. Best Keeper ranked Actb, Pgk1, and Sdha as the most stable and B2m as the least stable reference gene. Ppia and Hprt1 were the best choice reference genes according to the GeNorm algorithm. B2m expression was unstable and, therefore, would be invalid for RT-qPCR data normalization according to the GeNorm 0.5 cut-off M-Value.

The relative mRNA expression of reference genes normalized to the expression of three optimal reference genes

We analyzed the effects of mild ketosis induced by intermittent fasting combined with MCT supplementation on the expression of the analyzed genes normalized to the three most stable reference genes. Within the medial prefrontal cortex, this mild ketogenic intervention downregulated Sdha mRNA expression (t = 2.84, df = 12, p = 0.015; Fig 4B), and upregulated Gapdh mRNA expression (t = 3.67, df = 12, p = 0.003; Fig 4E). No significant changes were detected in either of the analyzed hippocampal areas (Figs 5 and 6). It should be noted that the variance of Gapdh mRNA expression in the ventral hippocampus was higher in MCT-fed animals compared to controls (F = 16.57, p = 0.007).

Fig 4. The effects of medium-chain triglyceride supplementation for 1 month on the mRNA expression of reference genes in the rat medial prefrontal cortex.

Fig 4

MCT (2 ml/kg body weight) were given as a supplement to standard feed to adult animals (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks (KD), while the control rats received equivolume water (SD). The mRNA expression was normalized to the geometric mean of the expression level of the three most stably expressed genes (Rpl13a, Actb, Ywhaz). *–p < 0.05, **–p < 0.01 (Student t-test).

Fig 5. The effects of medium-chain triglyceride supplementation for 1 month on the mRNA expression of reference genes in the rat dorsal hippocampal area.

Fig 5

MCT (2 ml/kg body weight) were given as a supplement to standard feed to adult animals (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks (KD), while the control rats received equivolume water (SD). The mRNA expression was normalized to the geometric mean of the expression level of the three most stably expressed genes (Rpl13a, Ywhaz, Pgk1).

Fig 6. The effects of medium-chain triglyceride supplementation for 1 month on the mRNA expression of reference genes in the rat ventral hippocampal area.

Fig 6

MCT (2 ml/kg body weight) were given as a supplement to standard feed to adult animals (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks (KD), while the control rats received equivolume water (SD). The mRNA expression was normalized to the geometric mean of the expression level of the three most stably expressed genes (Ywhaz, Sdha, Ppia).

Discussion

In the present work, we have analyzed the expression stability of nine housekeeping genes within the rat brain in the model of mild ketosis induced by MCT supplementation and intermittent fasting. We found that stability rankings strongly depended on the analyzed brain region.

The reference gene stability rankings significantly differed in the dorsal and ventral hippocampal areas. For example, Sdha expression was one of the most stable in the ventral hippocampus, while in the dorsal hippocampus, it had low stability and is, therefore, inappropriate for RT-qPCR data normalization. It is well known that dorsal and ventral hippocampal areas have different transcriptomic and functional properties [28]. Our present work, as well as our recent study in the model of juvenile seizures [18], suggest that reference gene stability varies in different hippocampal areas, which should be taken into account during RT-qPCR experimental design. Our findings on the heterogeneity of housekeeping gene expression in the hippocampus also emphasize that dorsal and ventral parts of the hippocampus should be analyzed separately in biochemical experiments.

The examined reference gene panel, overall, demonstrated lower stability in the dorsal hippocampus compared to the ventral hippocampus and the medial prefrontal cortex (Fig 2). This may reflect a higher sensitivity of the dorsal hippocampus to ketogenic treatment. Our data are in agreement with the evidence that ketogenic diet and MCT supplementation improve dorsal hippocampus-dependent cognitive functions [13, 29]. It should be noted that the protein products encoded by two of the three housekeeping genes with unstable expression in the dorsal hippocampus participate in glucose (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) and energy (succinate dehydrogenase subunit A) metabolism, which are known to be affected by ketogenic diet [29], yet Sdha had one of the highest stabilities in the ventral hippocampus. In our previous study in the model of acute seizures, the expression stability of these two genes (Gapdh and Sdha) in the rat brain varied independently among the analyzed regions [18]. The ketogenic intervention shifted the Gapdh and Sdha mRNA expression within the medial prefrontal cortex in opposite directions, when normalized to the three optimal reference genes. These changes may reflect region-specific metabolic switching in the rat brain. However, the extent of these changes was relatively small (less than 2-fold) for reliable detection by RT-qPCR analysis.

To sum up, we can conclude that reference gene expression stability varies among brain areas. The housekeeping gene expression seems to be affected by MCT supplementation in the dorsal hippocampus to a greater extent than in the ventral hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers and probes used for RT-PCR.

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. Stability values obtained by RefFinder online tool in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats fed with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT).

MCT oil (2 ml/kg body weight) was given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. (a) Coronal rat brain atlas diagrams (reproduced from Paxinos and Watson, 2007) showing mPFC (pink) boundaries at Bregma 4.20 mm and 2.52 mm, corresponding to the approximate rostral and caudal limits of mPFC collected for RT-PCR analysis. (b) RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated under gene names on X-axis) based on the geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: (c) comparative Delta-Ct, (d) BestKeeper, (e) NormFinder, and (f) GeNorm. Since the GeNorm method calculates M-values based on gene expression ratios, the pair of genes with the highest stabilities share the same M-value.

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Stability values obtained by RefFinder online tool in the dorsal hippocampus (DH) of rats fed with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT).

MCT oil (2 ml/kg body weight) was given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. (a) Coronal rat brain atlas diagrams (reproduced from Paxinos and Watson, 2007) showing DH (green) boundaries at Bregma -2.40 mm and -4.44 mm, corresponding to the approximate rostral and caudal limits of DH collected for RT-PCR analysis. (b) RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated under gene names on X-axis) based on the geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: (c) comparative Delta-Ct, (d) BestKeeper, € NormFinder, and (f) GeNorm. Since the GeNorm method calculates M-values based on gene expression ratios, the pair of genes with the highest stabilities share the same M-value. Dashed line indicates GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value: values above this line correspond to unstably expressed genes, which are invalid for RT-qPCR normalization. *–unstably expressed genes inappropriate for normalization according to the GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value.

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Stability values obtained by RefFinder online tool in the ventral hippocampus (VH) of rats fed with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT).

MCT oil (2 ml/kg body weight) was given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. (a) Coronal rat brain atlas diagrams (reproduced from Paxinos and Watson, 2007) showing VH (blue) boundaries at Bregma -4.44 mm and -5.28 mm, corresponding to the approximate rostral and caudal limits of VH collected for RT-PCR analysis. (b) RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated under gene names on X-axis) based on the geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: (c) comparative Delta-Ct, (d) BestKeeper, (e) NormFinder, and (f) GeNorm. Since the GeNorm method calculates M-values based on gene expression ratios, the pair of genes with the highest stabilities share the same M-value. Dashed line indicates GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value: values above this line correspond to unstably expressed genes, which are invalid for RT-qPCR normalization. *–unstably expressed genes inappropriate for normalization according to the GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value.

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Multiplex qPCR assay for Actb, Gapdh, and B2m genes demonstrate optimal efficiencies.

Efficiency was assessed by serial dilution method. Each standard curve was generated from a series of four-fold dilutions of pooled rat brain cDNA samples, collected in the main experiment.

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. Multiplex qPCR assay for Rpl13a, Sdha, and Ppia (CypA) genes demonstrate optimal efficiencies.

Efficiency was assessed by serial dilution method. Each standard curve was generated from a series of four-fold dilutions of pooled rat brain cDNA samples, collected in the main experiment.

(TIFF)

S6 Fig. Multiplex qPCR assay for Hprt1, Pgk1, and Ywhaz genes demonstrate optimal efficiencies.

Efficiency was assessed by serial dilution method. Each standard curve was generated from a series of four-fold dilutions of pooled rat brain cDNA samples, collected in the main experiment.

(TIFF)

Data Availability

The data presented in this study are available in the article and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF, project no. 19-75-10076). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chapman JR, Waldenström J. With reference to reference genes: A systematic review of endogenous controls in gene expression studies. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0141853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Swijsen A, Nelissen K, Janssen D, Rigo J-M, Hoogland G. Validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR studies in the dentate gyrus after experimental febrile seizures. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5: 685. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou J, Zhang X, Ren J, Wang P, Zhang J, Wei Z, et al. Validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in valproic acid rat models of autism. Mol Biol Rep. 2016;43: 837–847. doi: 10.1007/s11033-016-4015-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cook NL, Kleinig TJ, van den Heuvel C, Vink R. Reference genes for normalising gene expression data in collagenase-induced rat intracerebral haemorrhage. BMC Mol Biol. 2010;11: 7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen G, Zhao L, Feng J, You G, Sun Q, Li P, et al. Validation of reliable reference genes for real-time PCR in human umbilical vein endothelial cells on substrates with different stiffness. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e67360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nair AR, Smeets K, Keunen E, Lee WK, Thévenod F, Van Kerkhove E, et al. Renal cells exposed to cadmium in vitro and in vivo: normalizing gene expression data. J Appl Toxicol. 2015;35: 478–484. doi: 10.1002/jat.3047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Crans RAJ, Janssens J, Daelemans S, Wouters E, Raedt R, Van Dam D, et al. The validation of Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINEs) as a RT-qPCR normalization strategy in a rodent model for temporal lobe epilepsy. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0210567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Santos BPD, da Costa Diesel LF, da Silva Meirelles L, Nardi NB, Camassola M. Identification of suitable reference genes for quantitative gene expression analysis in rat adipose stromal cells induced to trilineage differentiation. Gene. 2016;594: 211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55: 611–622. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schwarz AP, Malygina DA, Kovalenko AA, Trofimov AN, Zaitsev AV. Multiplex qPCR assay for assessment of reference gene expression stability in rat tissues/samples. Mol Cell Probes. 2020;53: 101611. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2020.101611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Courchesne-Loyer A, Fortier M, Tremblay-Mercier J, Chouinard-Watkins R, Roy M, Nugent S, et al. Stimulation of mild, sustained ketonemia by medium-chain triacylglycerols in healthy humans: estimated potential contribution to brain energy metabolism. Nutrition. 2013;29: 635–640. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fortier M, Castellano C-A, Croteau E, Langlois F, Bocti C, St-Pierre V, et al. A ketogenic drink improves brain energy and some measures of cognition in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15: 625–634. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang D, Mitchell ES. Cognition and Synaptic-Plasticity Related Changes in Aged Rats Supplemented with 8- and 10-Carbon Medium Chain Triglycerides. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0160159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hollis F, Mitchell ES, Canto C, Wang D, Sandi C. Medium chain triglyceride diet reduces anxiety-like behaviors and enhances social competitiveness in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2018;138: 245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nair AB, Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2016;7: 27–31. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.177703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shcherbakova K, Schwarz A, Apryatin S, Karpenko M, Trofimov A. Supplementation of Regular Diet With Medium-Chain Triglycerides for Procognitive Effects: A Narrative Review. Front Nutr. 2022;9. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.934497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Hard Cover Edition. 6th ed. Academic Press; 2006. p. 456. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schwarz AP, Kovalenko AA, Malygina DA, Postnikova TY, Zubareva OE, Zaitsev AV. Reference Gene Validation in the Brain Regions of Young Rats after Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Seizures. Biomedicines. 2020;8. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8080239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chomczynski P. A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. BioTechniques. 1993;15: 532–4, 536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B. miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol Biol. 2012. doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9885-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Taki FA, Abdel-Rahman AA, Zhang B. A comprehensive approach to identify reliable reference gene candidates to investigate the link between alcoholism and endocrinology in Sprague-Dawley rats. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e94311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Silver N, Best S, Jiang J, Thein SL. Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol. 2006;7: 33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-7-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26: 509–515. doi: 10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004;64: 5245–5250. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3: RESEARCH0034. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.De Spiegelaere W, Dern-Wieloch J, Weigel R, Schumacher V, Schorle H, Nettersheim D, et al. Reference gene validation for RT-qPCR, a note on different available software packages. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0122515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25: 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fanselow MS, Dong H-W. Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures? Neuron. 2010;65: 7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Augustin K, Khabbush A, Williams S, Eaton S, Orford M, Cross JH, et al. Mechanisms of action for the medium-chain triglyceride ketogenic diet in neurological and metabolic disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17: 84–93. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30408-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dragan Hrncic

14 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-02598

Reference gene selection within the rat brain under mild intermittent ketosis induced by supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Schwarz,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:- please do follow directions of reviewers to improve your manuscript 

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 26 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Prof. Dragan Hrncic, MD, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 

“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state ""The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the present manuscript PONE-D-22-02598 authors investigated the effects of expression stability of 9 housekeeping genes widely used as reference and selected suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis within the brain structures in rat model of mild ketosis. They used contemporary methodology and generated a large number of interesting results with potential interest to genetics-oriented readers. The manuscript should be improved for clarity according to provided comments and directions.

Minor points

Title

- Title should be changed to better reflect a full content of the manuscript.

- Maybe, one form of the title could be:” Reference gene expression stability within the rat brain under mild intermittent ketosis induced by supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides”

General

- English should be checked with corrections of some typos.

Abstract

- Please, introduce all abbreviations in appropriate places.

- Avoid starting this section with an abbreviation on the first place of the sentence.

- Address the impact of model of mild ketosis induced by medium-chain triglyceride supplementation and its relationship to genes expression.

Introduction

- Add a paragraph and explain the importance of selected genes, and describe some other studies which investigated the similar problematic.

- At the end of this section should be placed the aim of this study.

Material and methods

- In Animals and study design subsection, please add the number of ethical permission.

- Also, your manuscript will benefit by adding of one new figure with experimental timeline, which should be placed in Animals and study design subsection.

Results

- In Figures 3-5, for more clarity, colors could be additionally added, but it is not mandatory

Discussion

- Some typos should be corrected.

Reviewer #2: Positive comments

1. The paper is well written

2. The rationale behind executing the project is sound

3. The selection of initial reference genes for testing was based on the role of different genes in cell functions and also based on available literature

Revision Needed

1. Authors need to explain the PCR efficiency of the primers in the manuscript

2. Why were the authors using 2 mL/kg daily? Please give some supportive references.

3. *Line no. : 154: "RefFinder® online tool (https://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder/)". Delete the website address as it was mentioned once in line 129.

4. In general, the authors should be writing medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) as either ‘MCT’ or ‘MCT oil’ in whole article.

5. Though gene expression was normalized with the three reference genes selected, this data still needs to be validated for gene expression with the bottom genes. This further proves the validity of the reference genes selected (Sahu., et al 2018)

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Nikola Šutulović

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0273224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273224.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Aug 2022

Prof. Dragan Hrncic, MD, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hrncic,

Thank you and the reviewers for working on our manuscript and all the valuable comments and suggestions. We have prepared a revised version of the article with the changes marked. Briefly, we have corrected some typos throughout the manuscript and changed the title according to the reviewer's suggestion.

Please find the detailed answers to the reviewers’ comments below.

Reviewer 1

«Title

- Title should be changed to better reflect a full content of the manuscript.

- Maybe, one form of the title could be:” Reference gene expression stability within the rat brain under mild intermittent ketosis induced by supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides”».

We changed the Manuscript title according to the reviewer’s suggestion.

«Abstract

- Please, introduce all abbreviations in appropriate places.

- Avoid starting this section with an abbreviation on the first place of the sentence.

- Address the impact of model of mild ketosis induced by medium-chain triglyceride supplementation and its relationship to genes expression.»

We edited the abstract to mention the full name of the method and added abbreviations’ disambiguation whereby needed (e.g. MCT, RT-qPCR). We also added two sentences describing our model of mild ketosis: this approach allows to reproduce certain neuroprotective effects of the classical ketogenic diet while avoiding its adverse effects. Ketogenic treatment targets multiple metabolic pathways, which may affect the reference gene expression.

«Introduction

- Add a paragraph and explain the importance of selected genes, and describe some other studies which investigated the similar problematic.

- At the end of this section should be placed the aim of this study.»

We rearranged this section, moving the paragraph about the aim of the study to the end of the section. We also added information about the functional properties of the analyzed gene products.

«Material and methods

- In Animals and study design subsection, please add the number of ethical permission.

- Also, your manuscript will benefit by adding of one new figure with experimental timeline, which should be placed in Animals and study design subsection.»

We added the permission number and created a figure with the experimental timeline (Figure 1 in the revised version).

«Results

- In Figures 3-5, for more clarity, colors could be additionally added, but it is not mandatory»

We made colored versions of the graphs (figures 4-6 in the revised manuscript).

Reviewer 2.

1. «Authors need to explain the PCR efficiency of the primers in the manuscript».

We added the information about the range of measured PCR efficiencies to the Method section. The full information is presented in the Supplementary figures S4-S6.

2. «Why were the authors using 2 mL/kg daily? Please give some supportive references.».

We used this dosage to mimic typical low doses used in human studies. We added the supporting references in the Materials and Methods section.

3. «*Line no. : 154: "RefFinder® online tool (https://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder/)". Delete the website address as it was mentioned once in line 129.»

We deleted the repeated mention of the URL.

4. In general, the authors should be writing medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) as either ‘MCT’ or ‘MCT oil’ in whole article.

We chose MCT for the whole article in the revised version.

5. Though gene expression was normalized with the three reference genes selected, this data still needs to be validated for gene expression with the bottom genes. This further proves the validity of the reference genes selected (Sahu., et al 2018)

We would like to thank Reviewer 2 for this suggestion, but we decided not to change our article in this way. Of course, the calculations for the genes of interest to the unstable genes could be used as a vivid illustration of the biases resulting from incorrect normalization. However, it would be a good approach if we were working with «marker» genes that moderately changed under the analyzed experimental conditions. In our case, we work with a new model, which is not well described in rats. So, we feel that the calculation of custom gene of interest expression normalized to different references would make our article more complicated and would not clarify the results.

We are looking forward for your review of the revised manuscript.

Alexander Schwarz

Ph.D., Research Fellow

Laboratory of Molecular Mechanisms of Neuronal Interactions

I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry

St. Petersburg, Russia

Aleksandr.Pavlovich.Schwarz@gmail.com

Attachment

Submitted filename: Schwarz_et_al_Response_to_Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Dragan Hrncic

5 Aug 2022

Reference gene expression stability within the rat brain under mild intermittent ketosis induced by supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides

PONE-D-22-02598R1

Dear Dr. Schwarz,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Prof. Dragan Hrncic, MD, PhD 

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Dragan Hrncic

26 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-02598R1

Reference gene expression stability within the rat brain under mild intermittent ketosis induced by supplementation with medium-chain triglycerides

Dear Dr. Schwarz:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Dragan Hrncic

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Primers and probes used for RT-PCR.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Fig. Stability values obtained by RefFinder online tool in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats fed with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT).

    MCT oil (2 ml/kg body weight) was given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. (a) Coronal rat brain atlas diagrams (reproduced from Paxinos and Watson, 2007) showing mPFC (pink) boundaries at Bregma 4.20 mm and 2.52 mm, corresponding to the approximate rostral and caudal limits of mPFC collected for RT-PCR analysis. (b) RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated under gene names on X-axis) based on the geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: (c) comparative Delta-Ct, (d) BestKeeper, (e) NormFinder, and (f) GeNorm. Since the GeNorm method calculates M-values based on gene expression ratios, the pair of genes with the highest stabilities share the same M-value.

    (TIFF)

    S2 Fig. Stability values obtained by RefFinder online tool in the dorsal hippocampus (DH) of rats fed with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT).

    MCT oil (2 ml/kg body weight) was given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. (a) Coronal rat brain atlas diagrams (reproduced from Paxinos and Watson, 2007) showing DH (green) boundaries at Bregma -2.40 mm and -4.44 mm, corresponding to the approximate rostral and caudal limits of DH collected for RT-PCR analysis. (b) RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated under gene names on X-axis) based on the geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: (c) comparative Delta-Ct, (d) BestKeeper, € NormFinder, and (f) GeNorm. Since the GeNorm method calculates M-values based on gene expression ratios, the pair of genes with the highest stabilities share the same M-value. Dashed line indicates GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value: values above this line correspond to unstably expressed genes, which are invalid for RT-qPCR normalization. *–unstably expressed genes inappropriate for normalization according to the GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value.

    (TIFF)

    S3 Fig. Stability values obtained by RefFinder online tool in the ventral hippocampus (VH) of rats fed with medium-chain triglycerides (MCT).

    MCT oil (2 ml/kg body weight) was given as a supplement to standard feed to adult (9 m.o., BW = 444 ± 69 g) animals by oral gavage daily for 4 weeks, while the control rats received equivolume water. (a) Coronal rat brain atlas diagrams (reproduced from Paxinos and Watson, 2007) showing VH (blue) boundaries at Bregma -4.44 mm and -5.28 mm, corresponding to the approximate rostral and caudal limits of VH collected for RT-PCR analysis. (b) RefFinder comprehensive ranking (ranks are indicated under gene names on X-axis) based on the geometric mean of ranks obtained by four methods: (c) comparative Delta-Ct, (d) BestKeeper, (e) NormFinder, and (f) GeNorm. Since the GeNorm method calculates M-values based on gene expression ratios, the pair of genes with the highest stabilities share the same M-value. Dashed line indicates GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value: values above this line correspond to unstably expressed genes, which are invalid for RT-qPCR normalization. *–unstably expressed genes inappropriate for normalization according to the GeNorm cut-off 0.5 M-Value.

    (TIFF)

    S4 Fig. Multiplex qPCR assay for Actb, Gapdh, and B2m genes demonstrate optimal efficiencies.

    Efficiency was assessed by serial dilution method. Each standard curve was generated from a series of four-fold dilutions of pooled rat brain cDNA samples, collected in the main experiment.

    (TIFF)

    S5 Fig. Multiplex qPCR assay for Rpl13a, Sdha, and Ppia (CypA) genes demonstrate optimal efficiencies.

    Efficiency was assessed by serial dilution method. Each standard curve was generated from a series of four-fold dilutions of pooled rat brain cDNA samples, collected in the main experiment.

    (TIFF)

    S6 Fig. Multiplex qPCR assay for Hprt1, Pgk1, and Ywhaz genes demonstrate optimal efficiencies.

    Efficiency was assessed by serial dilution method. Each standard curve was generated from a series of four-fold dilutions of pooled rat brain cDNA samples, collected in the main experiment.

    (TIFF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Schwarz_et_al_Response_to_Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data presented in this study are available in the article and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES