Table 4.
Statistical Analysis of Results for Landmark Displacement Ratios of Smiling Faces
Women | Cheilion | Alare | Crista Philtri | Men | Cheilion | Alare | Crista Philtri |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANOVA | <0.0001* | 0.2971 | 0.0004* | ANOVA | <0.0001* | 0.0015* | <0.0001* |
Tukey’s | Tukey’s | ||||||
Female 4–8 versus Female 8–12 | 0.9981 | 0.7569 | 0.576 | Male 4–8 versus Male 8–12 | 0.9738 | 0.9647 | 0.9102 |
Female 4–8 versus Female 12–16 | 0.0838 | 0.7064 | 0.0097* | Male 4–8 versus Male 12–16 | 0.2139 | 0.937 | 0.056 |
Female 4–8 versus Female > 16 | 0.061 | 0.9995 | 0.0157* | Male 4–8 versus Male > 16 | 0.0008* | 0.0848 | 0.0013* |
Female 8–12 versus Female 12–16 | 0.0047* | 0.9865 | 0.0269* | Male 8–12 versus Male 12–16 | 0.0176* | 0.5806 | 0.055 |
Female 8–12 versus Female > 16 | <0.0001* | 0.4042 | 0.0177* | Male 8–12 versus Male > 16 | <0.0001* | 0.0247* | <0.0001* |
Female 12–16 versus Female > 16 | 0.966 | 0.5327 | 0.7529 | Male 12–16 versus Male > 16 | 0.295 | 0.0049* | 0.8392 |
Statistical analysis between age groups for both genders for the smiling faces. The ANOVA and the Tukey’s post hoc test were performed.
Statistically significant (P < 0.05).