Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;11(1):e4762. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004762

Table 4.

Statistical Analysis of Results for Landmark Displacement Ratios of Smiling Faces

Women Cheilion Alare Crista Philtri Men Cheilion Alare Crista Philtri
ANOVA <0.0001* 0.2971 0.0004* ANOVA <0.0001* 0.0015* <0.0001*
Tukey’s Tukey’s
Female 4–8 versus Female 8–12 0.9981 0.7569 0.576 Male 4–8 versus Male 8–12 0.9738 0.9647 0.9102
Female 4–8 versus Female 12–16 0.0838 0.7064 0.0097* Male 4–8 versus Male 12–16 0.2139 0.937 0.056
Female 4–8 versus Female > 16 0.061 0.9995 0.0157* Male 4–8 versus Male > 16 0.0008* 0.0848 0.0013*
Female 8–12 versus Female 12–16 0.0047* 0.9865 0.0269* Male 8–12 versus Male 12–16 0.0176* 0.5806 0.055
Female 8–12 versus Female > 16 <0.0001* 0.4042 0.0177* Male 8–12 versus Male > 16 <0.0001* 0.0247* <0.0001*
Female 12–16 versus Female > 16 0.966 0.5327 0.7529 Male 12–16 versus Male > 16 0.295 0.0049* 0.8392

Statistical analysis between age groups for both genders for the smiling faces. The ANOVA and the Tukey’s post hoc test were performed.

*

Statistically significant (P < 0.05).