Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 31;20(2):229–238. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01687-w

Extended Data Fig. 10. Benchmarking spatial and nonspatial factor models on XYZeq mouse liver gene expression data.

Extended Data Fig. 10

(a) Lower deviance indicates higher generalization accuracy. All spatial models used 288 inducing points. lik: likelihood, dim: number of latent dimensions (components), FA: factor analysis, RSF: real-valued spatial factorization, PNMF: probabilistic nonnegative matrix factorization, NSF: nonnegative spatial factorization, NSFH: NSF hybrid model. (b) Each feature (gene) was assigned a spatial importance score derived from NSFH fit with 6 components (3 spatial and 3 nonspatial). A score of 1 indicates spatial components explain all the variation. (c) as (b) but with observations instead of features.