Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 27;14:1115321. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1115321

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study Age (y) BMI (kg/m2) Diabetes duration (y) Follow-up (weeks) Number of patients Intervention Instrument
Kim 2014 (13) 55.7 ± 10.4 31.9 ± 4.9 / 104 29 empagliflozin 25mg qd + metformin MRI
22 glimepiride 1-4mg qd + metformin
Bando 2017 (14) 55.0 ± 8.6 27.6 ± 3.6 9.7 ± 4.4 12 40 ipragliflozin 50 mg qd CT
22 continued previous treatment
Ito 2017 (15) 58.2 ± 10.9 30.3 ± 5.6 9.1 ± 5.8 24 32 ipragliflozin 50 mg qd CT
34 pioglitazone 15–30 mg qd
Inoue 2019 (9) 60.7 ± 10.9 27.8 ± 4.2 17. 5± 9.4 24 24 ipragliflozin 50 mg qd MRI
24 continued previous treatment
Shimizu 2019 (16) 56.6 ± 12.4 27.9 ± 4.2 / 24 33 dapagliflozin 5mg qd BIA
24 standard treatment
Han 2020 (18) 53.9 ± 10.9 30.3 ± 4.6 9.4 ± 5.8 24 30 ipragliflozin 50mg qd + metformin + pioglitazone CT
15 metformin + pioglitazone
Sakurai 2020 (17) 58.6 ± 12.5 27.6 ± 6.0 / 12 31 empagliflozin 10 mg qd BIA
18 standard treatment
Chehrehgosha 2021 (20) 51.2 ± 8.1 30.5 ± 3.9 6.3 ± 4.7 24 35 empagliflozin 10 mg qd DEXA
37 placebo
Gaborit 2021 (19) 56.9 ± 9.6 34.9 ± 6.0 11.1 ± 6.7 12 26 empagliflozin 10 mg qd MRI
25 placebo
Horibe 2022 (21) 60.9 ± 9.7 27.8 ± 3.9 12.5 ± 8.1 24 26 dapagliflozin 5 mg qd MRI
24 standard treatment

CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; DEXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis.