Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 27;14:1115321. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1115321

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis.

Study characteristics VAT (cm2) SAT (cm2)
Study number Patient number WMD [95% Cl] P-value Study number Patient number WMD [95% Cl] P-value
Empagliflozin 4 223 -2.55 [-7.47, 2.37] 0.31 1 51 -1.90 [-7.49, 3.69] 0.50
Dapagliflozin 2 99 -10.01 [-27.05, 7.04] 0.25 2 99 -23.87 [-52.72, 4.98] 0.10
Ipragliflozin 4 208 -26.38 [-33.20, -19.57] 0.0008 4 208 -23.42 [-44.82, -2.03] 0.03
BMI ≥ 28(kg/m2) 5 284 -18.22 [-30.67, -5.76] 0.004 3 161 -16.24 [-40.27, 7.80] 0.19
BMI < 28(kg/m2) 5 246 -16.78 [-25.85, -7.71] 0.0003 4 197 -25.17 [-34.32, -16.02] <0.00001
Follow-up ≥ 24weeks 7 368 -17.65 [-27.40, -7.90] 0.0004 6 296 -19.37 [-37.08, -1.67] 0.03
Follow-up <24weeks 3 162 -11.34 [-28.70, 6.01] 0.2 1 62 -19.00 [-65.20, 27.20] 0.42