TABLE 2.
(a) Model comparison | ||||
Model | AIC | ΔAIC | Weight | |
Day*Food | 2574.53 | 0.00 | 0.64 | |
Day*Food + Genotype | 2576.50 | 1.97 | 0.24 | |
Day*Food + Genotype*Food | 2577.73 | 3.20 | 0.13 | |
Additional candidate models had no support | ||||
(b) Best model summary | ||||
Model: Offspring ~ Day*Food + (1|host individual) | ||||
Predictor | Level | Coefficient ± SE | z score | p value |
(Intercept) | 4.13 ± 0.16 | 25.82 | <.001*** | |
Day | 3 | 0.71 ± 0.20 | 3.51 | <.001*** |
4 | 0.09 ± 0.21 | 0.41 | .685 | |
5 | −1.44 ± 0.23 | −6.29 | <.001*** | |
6 | −3.21 ± 0.25 | −12.79 | <.001*** | |
7 | −4.97 ± 0.38 | −13.07 | <.001*** | |
Food | OP50 | −0.68 ± 0.23 | −2.89 | .004** |
HB101 | 0.43 ± 0.23 | 1.85 | .065 | |
Day:Food | 3:OP50 | 0.56 ± 0.30 | 1.87 | .061 |
4:OP50 | 1.03 ± 0.31 | 3.37 | <.001*** | |
5:OP50 | 1.40 ± 0.32 | 4.37 | <.001*** | |
6:OP50 | 1.18 ± 0.35 | 3.35 | <.001*** | |
7:OP50 | 1.47 ± 0.50 | 2.96 | .003** | |
3:HB101 | −0.14 ± 0.30 | −0.48 | .633 | |
4:HB101 | −2.80 ± 0.32 | −8.84 | <.001*** | |
5:HB101 | −4.21 ± 0.49 | −8.60 | <.001*** | |
6:HB101 | −3.69 ± 0.78 | −4.73 | <.001*** | |
7:HB101 | −2.61 ± 1.09 | −2.40 | .017* |
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.