Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;86(4):352–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.02.012

Table 2.

Primary outcome and sensitivity analyses.

Treated Untreated
Primary analysis: (adjusted for age, sex, WIMD, vaccination status, number of comorbidities)
 Numbers included 2040 4973
 No. of events (%) 84 (4.1) 544 (10.9)
 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.65 (0.51–0.82)
Sensitivity analysis: unadjusted
 Numbers included 2040 4973
 No. of events (%) 84 (4.1) 544 (10.9)
 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.48 (0.38–0.61)
Sensitivity analysis: (adjusted for age, sex, WIMD, vaccination status, clinical group)
 Numbers included 2040 4973
 No. of events (%) 84 (4.1) 544 (10.9)
 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.61 (0.48–0.78)
Sensitivity analysis: (adjusted for age, sex, WIMD, vaccination status, weighted CCI score)
 Numbers included 2040 4973
 No. of events (%) 84 (4.1) 544 (10.9)
 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.67 (0.53–0.85)
Sensitivity analysis: time-independent (adjusted for age, sex, WIMD, vaccination status, number of comorbidities)
 Numbers included 2072 4941
 No. of events (%) 116 (5.6) 512 (10.4)
 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.72 (0.58–0.88)
Sensitivity analysis: logistic model (adjusted for age, sex, WIMD, vaccination status, number of comorbidities)a
 Numbers included 2072 4941
 No. of events (%) 116 (5.6) 512 (10.4)
 Odds ratio (95% CI) 0.70 (0.57–0.88)
a

The treated group included 32 individuals who received treatment after hospitalization.