Table 2.
Critical appraisal of included reviews27
| Included reviews | Questiona |
No. of criteria met | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ||
| Delgado-Noguera et al (2011)36 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | U | Y | N | Y | Y | 8 |
| Dudley et al (2015)1 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | 9 |
| Evans et al (2012)19 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 11 |
| Langellotto et al (2012)37 | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | 8 |
| Metcalfe et al (2020)38 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | N | Y | 8 |
| Micha et al (2018)22 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 11 |
| Morgan et a. (2020)39 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | U | Y | Y | 10 |
| Silveira et al (2011)40 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | 8 |
Question (Q)1: Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? Q2: Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? Q3: Was the search strategy appropriate? Q4: Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? Q5: Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? Q6: Was critical appraisal conducted by ≥2 reviewers independently? Q7: Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? Q8: Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Q9: Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? Q10: Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? Q11: Were the specific directives for new research appropriate? Based on Chai et al.33
Abbreviations: ES, effect size; N, no; U, unclear; Y, yes.