Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;12(3):891–917. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00762-9

Table 3.

Antibiotic treatment prior to ceftazidime–avibactam therapy by indication

Characteristic cIAI
(n = 90)
cUTI
(n = 103)
HAP/VAP
(n = 114)
Other
(n = 209)a
Total
(n = 516)
Any antibiotic(s) used for current infection before ceftazidime–avibactam, n (%)
 No 16 (17.8) 28 (27.2) 14 (12.3) 61 (29.2) 119 (23.1)
 Yes 74 (82.2) 75 (72.8) 100 (87.7) 148 (70.8) 397 (76.9)
Reason for discontinuation per antibiotic, n (%)
 n 73 75 100 141 389
 Perceived clinical failure/disease progression 27 (37.0) 14 (18.7) 44 (44.0) 49 (34.8) 134 (34.4)
 Isolation of a resistant bacteria 44 (60.3) 54 (72.0) 50 (50.0) 88 (62.4) 236 (60.7)
 Preference for empiric coverage 5 (6.8) 5 (6.7) 11 (11.0) 11 (7.8) 32 (8.2)
 Secondary infection requiring regimen change 9 (12.3) 1 (1.3) 13 (13.0) 12 (8.5) 35 (9.0)
Any antibiotic for Gram-negative coverage used for current infection before ceftazidime–avibactam, n (%)
 No (ceftazidime–avibactam as first line) 18 (20.0) 31 (30.1) 15 (13.2) 62 (29.7) 126 (24.4)
 Yes (ceftazidime–avibactam as second line) 72 (80.0) 72 (69.9) 99 (86.8) 147 (70.3) 390 (75.6)

One reason per antibiotic—patients could receive several antibiotics

BSI bloodstream infection, cIAI complicated intra-abdominal infection, cUTI complicated urinary tract infection, HAP hospital-acquired pneumonia, VAP ventilator-associated pneumonia

aIncludes patients with BSI/sepsis