Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 27;13(3):439. doi: 10.3390/ani13030439

Table 2.

Growth performance of rabbits supplemented with bee pollen.

Item N (NC) Heterogeneity Egger Test 1
Control means (SD) WMD (95 % CI) p-Value p-Value I2 (%) p-Value
ADG, g/d 11 (27) 21.38 (7.33) 1.309 (0.802; 1.816) <0.001 <0.001 87.91 0.182
DFI, g/d 10 (25) 149.4 (62.9) −0.935 (−1.343; −0.527) <0.001 <0.001 81.96 0.061
FCR, DMI/ADG 8 (19) 4.49 (1.00) −0.708 (−1.021; −0.395) <0.001 <0.001 99.45 0.353
HCY, % 4 (7) 53.68 (4.53) 2.723 (1.155; 4.290) <0.001 <0.001 93.10 NA

N: number of studies; NC: number of comparisons; SD: standard deviation; WMD: weighted mean differences between control and treatments supplemented with bee pollen; CI: confidence interval of SMD; p-Value for the χ2 test of heterogeneity; I2: proportion of total variation of size effect estimates that is due to heterogeneity; 1: Egger’s regression asymmetry test; ADG: average daily gain; DFI: daily feed intake; FCR: feed conversion ratio; HCY: hot carcass yield.