Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;15(3):854. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030854

Table 3.

The multivariate Cox regression analysis of factors predicting overall survival.

Factors Case No. HR 95% CI p-Value
Age (year)
≤55 vs. >55 24/64 0.906 0.453–1.811 0.780
Gender
male vs. female 70/18 1.715 0.792–3.716 0.171
Child-Pugh score
A vs. B–C 59/28 0.144 0.056–0.370 <0.001
BCLC stage
B vs. C–D 11/77 1.416 0.536–3.745 0.483
CLIP score
0-1 vs. 2-5 35/53 0.786 0.317–1.945 0.602
ECOG score
0 vs. ≥ 1 47/38 0.296 0.135–0.651 0.002
ALBI grade
1 vs. 2–3 35/48 0.539 0.198–1.466 0.226
Distal metastasis
positive vs. negative 52/36 1.713 0.841–3.488 0.138
α-Fetoprotein level (ng/mL)
< 400 vs. ≥ 400 46/40 0.921 0.457–1.857 0.819
Combination therapy as systemic line
1st line vs. ≥ 2nd line 31/57 1.312 0.660–2.606 0.439
MTKI type
lenvatinib vs. sorafenib 49/39 0.394 0.183–0.849 0.017
ICI type §
nivolumab vs. pembrolizumab 47/38 1.213 0.576–2.557 0.611

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CLIP, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program Scoring System; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale; ALBI, albumin–bilirubin; MTKIs, multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors; ICIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors. Five patients had no baseline ALBI grade data. Two patients had no baseline α-Fetoprotein level. § Three patients had accepted both nivolumab and pembrolizumab during combination therapy.