Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 30;15(3):844. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030844

Table 1.

Efficacy of Targeted Therapies in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases.

Trial Phase Systemic Therapy Setting/CNS Inclusion Criteria Sample Size (with CNS Disease) Key Results (CNS Outcomes) Publication Year Reference
EGFR Typical Mutations (Exon 19 Deletions and Exon 21 L858R Mutations)
AURA 3 III Osimertinib (Osi) vs. Platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) T790M+ NSCLC patients with asymptomatic, stable BM following POD with prior EGFR-TKI Measurable BM: Osi (n = 30) vs. Chemo (n = 26)
All BM:
Osi (n = 75) vs. Chemo (n = 41)
All BM: CNS ORR, Osi (40%) vs. chemo (17%), OR 3.24 (p = 0.014)
CNS median DOR: Osi (8.9 mo) vs. Chemo (5.7 mo)
Median iPFS: Osi (11.7 mo) vs. Chemo (5.6 mo)
Median PFS: Osi (8.5 mo) vs. Chemo (4.2 mo); HR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.21–0.49)
2018 [25]
FLAURA III Osimertinib (Osi) vs. SOC EGFR-TKI Treatment-naïve EGFR-mutated NSCLC
Patients with asymptomatic or stable BM
Symptomatic pts must have stable neurologic status ≥ 2 weeks following definitive local therapy
Measurable BM: Osi (n = 22), SOC EGFR-TKI (n = 19)
All BM:
Osi (n = 61) vs. SOC EGFR-TKI (n = 67)
All BM CNS ORR:
Osi (66%) vs. SOC EGFR-TKI (43%)
CNS Median DOR: Osi (15.2 mo) vs. SOC EGR-TKI (18.7 mo)
Median iPFS: Osi (NR) vs. SOC EGFR-TKI (13.9 mo)
PFS at 18 months: 58% (95% CI: 40–72) in osimertinib group
OS (BM subgroup): HR 0.83 (0.53–1.30)
2018 [26]
EGFR Exon 20 Insertion
NCT02716116 I, II Mobocertinib Previously treated
Patients with active and symptomatic BM included
N = 12 CNS ORR: N/A
Overall CNS ORR: 25%, among the patients with BM
2021 [25]
Combined EGFR and VEGF Inhibition
NEJ026 III Erlotnib vs. Erlotinib/bevacizumab EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC
Patients with BM requiring anti-edema drugs excluded
All BM:
Erlotnib (n = 36) vs. Erlotinib/bevacizumab (n = 36)
OS (BM subgroup): HR 0.839 (0.432–1.629) 2021 [27]
ALK Rearrangement
NCT02075840 II Alectinib Disease progression on crizotinib
Patients with stable, treated brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases or asymptomatic untreated brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases were allowed
All BM (n = 84) CNS ORR 57% (95% CI, 39% to 74%)
CNS disease control rate 83% (95% CI, 74% to 91%),
CNS DOR was 10.3 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 11.2 months)
CNS CR in 43% of patients with baseline CNS metastases
2016 [28]
ALEX III Alectinib vs. Crizotinib Treatment of naïve patients with asymptomatic BM (treatment with local therapy allowed) All BM:
Alectinib (n = 64) vs. Crizotinib (n = 58)
Measurable BM: Alectinib (n = 21) vs. Crizotinib (n = 22)
All BM: CNS ORR, Alectinib (36%) vs. Crizotinib (28.6%) with prior radiation; Alectinib (74.4%) vs. Crizotinib (24.3%) without prior radiation
CNS Median DOR: Alectinib (NR) vs. Crizotinib (17.3 mo)
2018 [29]
J-ALEX III Alectinib vs. Crizotinib Treatment naïve, or failed one line of chemotherapy regimen
Asymptomatic BM (treated or untreated allowed)
Alectinib (n = 14) vs. Crizotinib (n = 29) Time to CNS progression (alectinib superior): HR = 0.51, p = 0.2502 with baseline BM vs. HR = 0.19, p = 0.0004 without baseline BM
1-year CNS Cumulative Incidence Rate: Alectinib (5.9%) vs. Crizotinib (16.8%)
2018 [30]
ALTA II Brigatinib (Arm A—90 mg QD, Arm B—180 mg QD) Disease progression on crizotinib All BM: 154 CNS ORR 42% in arm A and 67% in arm B 2018 [31]
ALTA-1L III Brigatinib vs. Crizotinib Treatment-naïve
Patients with asymptomatic or stable BM not requiring steroids or anticonvulsive therapy 7 days prior to randomization
All BM: Brigatinib (n = 47) vs. Crizotinib (n = 49)
Measurable BM: Brigatinib (n = 18) vs. Crizotinib (n = 23)
Measurable BM: CNS ORR, Brigatinib (78%) vs. Crizotinib (26%), OR 11.67 (p = 0.0014)
Median iPFS: Brigatinib (24 mo) vs. Crizotinib (5.6 mo) in patients with baseline BM; 32.3 mo (Brigatinib) vs. Crizotinib (NR) in patients without baseline BM
2020 [31,32]
ASCEND-4 III Ceritinib vs. Platinum-based chemotherapy Treatment-naïve
Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases (prior treatment allowed)
All B: Ceritinib (n = 59) vs. Chemotherapy (n = 80) CNS ORR ceritinib (72.7%) vs. chemotherapy (27.3%)
Median CNS DOR ceritinib (16.6 mo-NR) vs. chemotherapy (NE)
2017 [33]
ASCEND-5 III Ceritinib vs. Single-agent chemotherapy Progression following crizotinib and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy
Patients with brain metastases
All BM: Ceritinib (n = 47) vs. chemotherapy (n = 48) CNS ORR ceritinib (35%) vs. chemotherapy (5%)
DOR ceritinib 6.9 mo (95% CI 2·7–8·3 vs. chemotherapy (not evaluable)
2017 [34]
NCT01970865 II Lorlatinib Treatment-naïve (cohort 1), progression on crizotinib (cohort 2), progression on crizotinib and chemotherapy (cohort 3), progression on non-crizotinib ALK inhibitor +/- chemotherapy, progression on 2 or 3 non-crizotinib ALK inhibitors +/- chemotherapy (cohort 4)
Patients with asymptomatic BM (prior treatment allowed)
All BM: 141
Measurable BM: cohort 1 (n = 3), cohort 2 (n = 23), cohort 3 (n = 9), cohort 4 (n = 49)
CNS ORR cohort 1 (66.7%), cohort 2 (87%), cohort 3 (55.6%), cohort 4 (53.1%)
Median DOR (months), cohort 1 [NR (NR–NR)], cohort 2 [NR (8·4–NR)], cohort 3 [NR (4·1–NR)],
2018, 2021 [35,36]
CROWN III Lorlatinib vs. Crizotinib Treatment-naïve
Patients with asymptomatic BM (prior treatment allowed)
All BM: Lorlatinib (n = 38) vs. Crizotinib (n = 40)
Measurable BM: Lorlatinib (n = 17) vs. Crizotinib (n = 13)
All BM: CNS ORR, Lorlatinib (66%) vs. Crizotinib (20%); OR 8.41 (95% CI: 2.59–27.23)
Measurable BM: CNS ORR, Lorlatinib (82%) vs. Crizotinib (23%); OR 16.83 (95% CI: 1.95–163.23)
12-month iPFS: Lorlatinib (95%) vs. Crizotinib (60%); HR 0.07 (95% CI: 0.03–0.17)
2020 [37]
ROS1 Rearrangement
ALKA-372-001 STARTRK-1
STARTRK-2
I or II Entrectinib Treatment- naïve and previously treated
Patients with asymptomatic or stable BM with pretreatment
All BM (n = 46)
Measurable BM (n = 24)
All BM: CNS ORR, 52.2%; Median DOR: 12.9 mo; iPFS: 8.3 mo
Measurable BM: CNS ORR, 79.2%; Median DOR: 12.9 mo; iPFS: 12 mo
2021 [38]
NCT01970865 II Lorlatinib Treatment- naïve and previously treated
Patients with asymptomatic BM (prior treatment allowed)
Treatment-naïve (n = 11)
Previously treated (n = 24)
Treatment-naïve: CNS ORR, 64%; Median DOR: NR (95% CI: 5.7 to NR)
Previously treated: CNS ORR, 50%; Median DOR: NR (95% CI: 11.0 to NR)
2019 [39]
TRIDENT-1 II Repotretinib Treatment- naïve and previously treated
Patients with asymptomatic BM (prior treatment allowed) and/or asymptomatic leptomeningeal disease included
Treatment- naïve (n = 3)
Previously treated (n = 4)
Treatment- naïve: CNS ORR, 100% (3/3)
Previously treated: CNS ORR, 50% (2/4)
2019 [40]
KRAS G12C
CodeBreak 100 II Sotorasib Previously treated
Patients with active BMs were excluded
N = 26 No CNS results reported 2021 [41]
KRYSTAL-1 I Adagrasib Previously treated
Patients with active and/or stable previously treated BMs included
N = 42 CNS ORR 33% 2022 [42]
BRAF V600E Mutation
NCT01336634 II Dabrafenib and trametinib Treatment -naïve and previously treated patients
Patients with asymptomatic BM (if untreated, BM must be <1 cm, and if treated, must be stable for at least 3 weeks prior to enrollment)
All BM: (n = 3); Treatment naïve (n = 2) vs. Previously treated (n = 1) Treatment- naïve group: (n = 2), best response of non-CR or non-PD reported
Previously treated: (n = 1), N/A
2016, 2017 [43,44]
NTRK1/2/3 Gene Fusion
ALKA-372-001
STARTRK-1 STARTRK-2
I or II Entrectinib TRK inhibitor-naïve patients
Patients with asymptomatic BMs (prior treatment allowed)
All BM: (n = 16)
Measurable BM: (n = 8)
All BM: CNS ORR, 50%;
Median iPFS: 8.9 mo
Measurable BM: CNS ORR, 62.5%; Median iPFS 10.1 mo
2020 [45]
NCT02576431, NCT02637687 I or II Larotrectinib Non-primary CNS malignancy with BM or primary CNS malignancy
Patients with asymptomatic BM
All BM: (n = 5)
BM in lung cancer: (n = 3)
All BM: CNS ORR, 60% 2019 [46]
MET Exon 14 Skipping
GEOMETRY II Capmatinib Treatment-naïve and previously treated patients
Patients with non-enlarging BM (steroids therapy allowed, but no dose escalation in 2 weeks before enrollment)
All BM: (n = 13) CNS ORR: 54% 2020 [47]
VISION II Tepotinib Treatment-naïve and previously treated patients
Patients with asymptomatic BM
All BM: (n = 15)
Measurable BM: (n = 7)
CNS ORR: 71% (5/7)
CNS DOR: 87% (13/15)
2022 [48]
RET Rearrangement
ARROW I or II Pralsetinib Treatment-naïve and previously treated patients
Patients with stable, non-enlarging BM and absence of neurologic symptoms
Measurable BM (n = 9) CNS ORR: 56%, all complete responders 2021 [49]
LIBRETTO-001 I or II Selpercatinib Treatment-naïve and previously treated patients
Patients with stable neurologic diseases at baseline (steroids allowed, 14 days before enrollment; no neurosurgery or radiation for 28 days; SRS allowed, 14 days before enrollment)
Measurable BM (n = 22) Overall CNS ORR 81.8%; Prior RT (85.7%) vs. RT-naïve (75%)
CNS Median DOR: 9.4 mo
2021 [50]
ERBB2 (HER2) Mutation Positive
DESTINY-Lung01 II Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases
Progression following standard of care
BM (n = 33) PFS was 7.1 mo (95% CI, 5.5 to 9.8) and OS 13.8 mo (95% CI, 9.8 to 20.9)
No CNS-specific outcomes
2022 [51]

Abbreviations: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); progression of disease (POD); tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); brain metastases (BM); central nervous system (CNS); objective response rate (ORR); odds ratio (OR); duration of response (DOR); intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS); progression-free survival (PFS); hazard ratio (HR); confidence interval (CI); standard of care (SOC); overall survival (OS); complete response (CR); not reached (NR); radiotherapy (RT).