Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jan 3;195(2):257. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10772-8

Table 2.

Percent positive results for surface samples using TC and RV-PCR analytical methods

Maritime
surface/
material
sampled
Sample ID Sampling
method
Nominal
spore load
(CFU)
TC RV-PCR
Samples
positive
Total
samples
%
Samples
positive
Samples
positive
Total
samples
%
Samples
positive
RBS marine grade aluminum SBMGAL SS 0 2 6 33 0 6 0
300 5 6 83 6 6 100
3,000 6 6 100 6 6 100
Nonskid tread NSKID 0 3 7 43 0 7 0
300 5 7 71 6 7 86
3,000 7 7 100 7 7 100
Touch screen TCHSCRN 0 1 6 17 0 6 0
300 6 6 100 6 6 100
3,000 6 6 100 6 6 100
All surfaces sampled All surfaces sampled 0 6 19 32 0 19 0
300 16 19 84 18 19 95
3,000 19 19 100 19 19 100
N/A Lab/field controls 0 0 11 0 1 11 9
300 4 4 100 4 4 100
3,000 4 4 100 4 4 100
Nonskid tread NSKID VFC 0 1 8 13 0 8 0
300 5 8 63 5 8 63
3,000 8 8 100 7 8 88
Concrete pier CONPIER 0 3 8 38 0 8 0
300 7 8 88 6 8 75
3,000 8 8 100 7 8 88
All surfaces sampled All surfaces sampled 0 4 16 25 0 16 0
300 12 16 75 11 16 69
3,000 16 16 100 14 16 88
N/A Lab/field controls 0 1 11 9 0 11 0
300 6 6 100 6 6 100
3,000 6 6 100 6 6 100