Table 4.
T2 and PI-RADS Scoring | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
T2S | T2DLR | T2S | T2DLR | |
T2 score | ||||
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
4 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
PI-RADS score | ||||
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
4 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
Lesion size analysis revealed no significant differences between T2S and T2DLR for both readers (Table 5). In three cases both readers suspected extraprostatic growth regardless of the sequence (no histopathological confirmation was available).