Table 2.

Comparative analysis of the performance of the proposed model with some existing methods based on Dice score, IoU, and Hausdorff on a test dataset.

		ResNet34	ResNeXt50	InceptionV3	EfficientNetB2	Proposed
Stroma	Dice coefficient	0.935	0.949	0.947	0.949	0.956
	IoU	0.878	0.903	0.900	0.903	0.916
	Hausdorff (mm)	17.7	16.9	16.6	17.2	15.8
Benign	Dice coefficient	0.624	0.775	0.705	0.778	0.802
	IoU	0.453	0.633	0.544	0.638	0.670
	Hausdorff (mm)	17.4	16.9	16.4	17.3	16.2
Cancer	Dice coefficient	0.848	0.892	0.879	0.905	0.914
	IoU	0.736	0.805	0.785	0.827	0.843
	Hausdorff (mm)	17.5	16.9	16.3	16.9	15.9
Average	Dice coefficient	0.802	0.872	0.843	0.877	0.891
	IoU	0.689	0.780	0.743	0.789	0.811
	Hausdorff (mm)	17.5	16.9	16.4	17.1	15.9