Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 17;13(3):326. doi: 10.3390/ani13030326

Table 1.

Comparison of signalment, epidemiological data, and clinical scores of the dogs enrolled in the study.

Variables HC (n = 12) IBD (n = 34) p-Value
Age (years; mean ± SD) 5.31 ± 3.09 6.05 ± 3.47 0.519
Sex (male/female) 7/5 15/19 0.487
Fertile status (spayed or neutered/entire) 8/4 21/13 1.000
Breed (pure/mixed) 7/5 24/10 0.436
Weight (kg); median [range]) 13.85 [4.50–32.80] 11.80 [2.30–44] 0.763
BCS (1–9); median [range]) 5.50 [5–7] 4.00 [2–7] 0.001 *
Living with other pets (yes/no) 7/5 10/24 0.093
Habitat (indoor/50–50/outdoor) 8/0/4 25/7/2 0.025 *
CIBDAI (median [range]) 0 [0] 6.5 [3–10] <0.0001 *
CCECAI (median [range]) 0 [0] 7 [3–12] <0.0001 *
Duodenal biopsies/fecal samples 7/12 30/34 na

* p-value was significant when < 0.05; BCS, body condition score; CIBDAI, canine IBD activity index; CCECAI, canine chronic enteropathy clinical activity index; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; duodenal biopsies and fecal samples refer to the total number of dogs from which the samples were retrieved for microbiota analysis; na, not applied.