Table 5.
Results of the regression—model 2.
| Dependent Variable: WB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Coefficient | |||
| OLS | OLM | |||
| Female | Male | Female | Male | |
| WI | −0.1269 * | −0.1605 * | −0.3449 * | −0.4361 * |
| RC | 0.1246 * | 0.5961 *** | 0.3735 * | 1.7144 *** |
| ED | 0.1987 ** | −0.041 | 0.503 * | −0.2757 |
| ORG | 0.4229 *** | 0.3439 * | 1.1275 *** | 1.0405 ** |
| AUT | 0.1224 | −0.056 | 0.3612 | −0.1422 |
| WLB | 0.1981 ** | 0.0101 | 0.5378 ** | 0.1563 |
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Note: hypothesis testing—homoskedasticity: Breusch–Pagan–Godfrey test, Prob. Chi-square 0.16 for men and 0.42 for women; non-correlation of errors: Lagrange Multiplier test, Prob. Chi-square 0.16 for men and 0.17 for women; non-collinearity of variables, VIF values of independent variables less than 10: WI 1.68 men/1.67 women, RC 2.12 men/1.36 women, ED 1.86 men/2.19 women, ORG 1.35 men/1.48 women, AUT 1.63 men/1.43 women and WLB 1.40 men/1.76 women. Source: Elaborated by the authors in the EViews program.