Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;11(3):436. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030436

Table 3.

Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement equivalence of KAB theory in medication administration errors in ICU questionnaire across Italian nurses (1) and Iranian nurses (2): 1 vs. 2.

Scale χ2 CFI TLI RMSEA SRMR Wald Test Δχ2 Δgl p
Knowledge
Configural invariance 39.552 (p = 0.07)
14.285 vs. 25.464
0.939 0.909 0.094
(0.00–0.158)
0.072 14.285
df: 7—p < 0.05
- - -
Metric invariance 52.999 (p = 0.02)
25.324 vs. 27.675
0.906 0.887 0.105
(0.037–0.160)
0.177 52.514
df: 7—p < 0.001
13.447 7 0.06
Scalar invariance 96.745 (p < 0.001)
57.252 vs. 39.493
0.713 0.713 0.167
(0.124–0.211)
0.235 64.977
df: 7—p < 0.001
43.746 p < 0.001
Strict invariance 192.964 (p < 0.001)
56.377 vs. 136.588
0.244 0.352 0.251
(0.251–2.89)
0.546 - 96.219 7 p < 0.001
Attitude
Configural invariance 79.116 (p < 0.001)
40.594 vs. 38.522
0.904 0.856 0.079
(0.059–0.100)
0.044 59.294
df: 7—p < 0.001
- - -
Metric invariance 154.199 (p < 0.001)
48.802 vs. 105–397
0.776 0.731 0.108
(0.91–0.126)
0.235 10.674
df: 7—p = 0.15
75.083 7 p < 0.001
Scalar invariance 96.745 (p < 0.001)
57.252 vs. 39.439
0.713 0.713 0.167
(0.124–0.211)
0.235 64.977
df: 7—p = 0.15
57.454 7 p < 0.001
Strict invariance 164.546 (p < 0.001)
49.798 vs. 114.748
0.769 0.769 0.100
(−084–0.116)
0.245 - 67.802 7 p < 0.001
Behaviour
Configural invariance 17.519 (p = 0.06)
9.409 vs. 8.110
0.979 0.958 0.127
(0.00–0.224)
0.033 0.727
df: 5—p = 0.98
- - -
Metric invariance 18.251 (p < 0.05)
9.811 vs. 8.439
0.991 0.988 0.068
(0.00–0.162)
0.064 19.926
df: 5—p = 0.0013
0.732 5 0.98
Scalar invariance 36.726 (p = 0.0126)
22.353 vs. 14.373
0.954 0.954 0.134
(0.061–0.202)
0.126 26.809
df: 5—p < 0.001
18.475 5 p < 0.001
Strict invariance 76.680 (p < 0.001)
27.637 vs. 49.043
0.853 0.886 0.211
(0.158–0.265)
0.453 - 39.954 5 p < 0.001