Table 3.
Methodological quality of the studies using the tool RoB 2.0.
| First Author Name | Randomization Process | Deviation from the Intended Intervention | Missing Results Data | The Measurement Result | Selection of the Result Reported | General Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harnett, 2020 [33] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Ching Huang, 2019 [34] | Low | Low | Some concerns | Low | Low | Some concerns |
| Ching Huang, 2020 [35] | Low | Low | Some concerns | Low | Low | Some concerns |
| Komano, 2018 [36] | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | High |
| Pugh, 2020 [37] | Low | Low | Some concerns | Low | Low | Some concerns |
| Salleh, 2021 [38] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Sawadaa, 2019 [39] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Schreiber, 2021 [40] | Some concerns | Low | Some concerns | Low | Low | High |
| Shing, 2014 [41] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Smarkusz-Zarzecka, 2020 [42] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Strasser, 2016 [43] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Toohey, 2018 [44] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Townsend, 2018 [45] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |