Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;24(3):1893. doi: 10.3390/ijms24031893

Table 2.

Multiple regression analyses to evaluate strength of association of log[(EProt/Ccr × 105) with log log[(ECd/Ccr × 105) and other independent variables.

Independent Variables/
Factors
Urinary Excretion of Protein a
All subjects, n = 405 Males, n = 197 Females, n = 208
β b p β p β p
Age, years 0.263 <0.001 0.222 0.028 0.260 0.011
Log [(ECd/Ccr) × 105], µg/L filtrate 0.252 <0.001 0.376 <0.001 0.179 0.050
Diabetes −0.039 0.353 0.012 0.831 −0.097 0.114
Sex 0.078 0.107
Hypertension −0.065 0.152 −0.116 0.069 −0.002 0.974
Smoking −0.075 0.150 0.007 0.911 −0.152 0.040
Adjusted R2 0.306 <0.001 0.371 <0.001 0.259 <0.001

n, number of subjects; a urinary excretion of protein as log[(EProt/Ccr) ×105]; b β, standardized regression coefficients. Coding: female = 1, male = 2, hypertension = 1, normotension = 2, smoker = 1, non-smoker = 2. Data were generated from regression model analyses relating EProt to six independent variables (first column) in all subjects, males, and females. For all tests, p-values < 0.05 indicate a statistical significance association. β coefficients indicate the strength of association of EProt and independent variables. Adjusted R2 indicates the proportion of the variation in EProt attributable to all six independent variables.