Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 18;24(3):1893. doi: 10.3390/ijms24031893

Table 4.

Prevalence odds ratios for proteinuria and low eGFR in relation to cadmium excretion and other variables.

Parameters Number of Subjects Proteinuria a Low eGFR b
POR (95% CI) p POR (95% CI) p
Age, years 405 0.923 (0.897, 0.949) <0.001 0.888 (0.854, 0.924) <0.001
Diabetes 11 0.726 (0.181, 2.916) 0.652 0.582 (0.119, 2.861) 0.506
Sex (females) 208 1.030 (0.539, 1.971) 0.928 0.775 (0.336, 1.787) 0.550
Hypertension 56 0.498 (0.244, 1.017) 0.055 0.363 (0.159, 0.826) 0.016
Smoking 186 0.778 (0.398, 1.520) 0.462 1.271 (0.523, 3.092) 0.597
ECd/Ccr × 100, µg/L filtrate
0.04–2.71 203 Referent
2.72–8.28 102 1.252 (0.670, 2.341) 0.482 4.579 (1.116, 18.79) 0.035
8.29–63 100 4.575 (1.880, 11.13) 0.001 5.109 (2.093, 12.47) <0.001

POR, prevalence odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Coding: female = 1, male = 2, hypertensive = 1, normotensive = 2, smoker = 1, non-smoker = 2. a Proteinuria was defined as (EProt/Ccr) × 100 ≥ 20 mg/L filtrate; b low eGFR was defined as estimated GFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Data were generated from logistic regression analyses relating POR for proteinuria and low eGFR to a set of six independent variables (first column). For all tests, p-values ≤ 0.05 indicate a statistically significant association of POR with a given independent variable. Arithmetic means (SD) of (ECd/Ccr) × 100 ranges: 0.04–2.71, 2.72–8.28, and 8.29–63 µg/L filtrate were 0.59 (0.54), 5.40 (1.71), and 18.5 (10.5) µg/L filtrate, respectively.