Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031927

Table 3.

WHR and RFM measurements at T0 and T1.

T0 T1
All
(n = 157)
Boys
(n = 72)
Girls
(n = 85)
All
(n = 153)
Boys
(n = 67)
Girls
(n = 86)
p
Intervention group
WHR 0.44 ± 0.04 0.45 ± 0.01 0.42 ± 0.03 0.43 ± 0.03 0.44 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.03 0.0002
RFM 24.9 ± 1.6 25.1 ± 1.3 24.7 ± 1.8 26.4 ± 3.6 27.3 ± 2.7 25.5 ± 4.1 <0.0001
Control group
WHR 0.44 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.03 0.44 ± 0.04 0.45 ± 0.02 0.42 ± 0.01 >0.05
RFM 24.6 ± 2.7 24.8 ± 2.0 24.6 ± 2.2 25.1 ± 1.8 25.2 ± 2.1 24.8 ± 2.4 >0.05

WHR, waist-to-height ratio; RFM, relative fat mass; p significance between T0 and T1 by two-factor repeated measures ANOVA; small effect size by Cohen’s d.