Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;164(3):509–533. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002730

Table 2.

Multiple meta-regression analysis, predicting between-study variance in unidimensional outcomes using the level of similarity between active and sham control groups for a number of selected features in spinal manipulation trials.

Descriptives
Mean ES Mean (SD) similarity rating (n of sessions) Mean (SD) similarity rating (efficacy information) Mean (SD) similarity rating (environment) R 2 k
−0.33 1.91 (0.37) 0.6 (1.03) 1.43 (0.74) 0.5934 35
Homogeneity analysis
Q df P T 2 I2
Model 50.33 3 0.0000 0.077 94.0%
Residual 34.49 31 0.30 0.006 10.1%
Total 82.15 34 0.0000
Regression coefficients
B SE −95% CI +95% CI Z P Beta
Constant −2.64 0.36 −3.35 −1.93 −7.27 0.0000 0.0000
Similarity: N of sessions 1.09 0.19 . 72 1.47 5.75 0.0000 . 65
Similarity: efficacy information 0.13 0.05 0.02 0.23 2.3 0.02 0.27
Similarity: environment 0.07 0.08 −0.08 0.22 0.89 0.37 0.11
Method of moments random effects variance component
v = 0.03

Means and variance of the similarity ratings included in the model are provided, having a possible range of −2 (different for all studies) to 2 (similar across all studies).