Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;164(3):509–533. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002730

Table 3.

Multiple meta-regression analysis, predicting between-study variance in unidimensional outcomes using the level of similarity between active and sham control groups for a number of selected features in trials of craniosacral and gentle myofascial treatments.

Descriptives
Mean ES Mean (SD) similarity rating (body areas) Mean (SD) similarity rating (efficacy information) Mean (SD) similarity rating (application mode) R 2 K
−0.48 0.18 (1.9) 0.55 (0.93) 0.18 (2.1) 0.7299 11
Homogeneity analysis
Q Df P T 2 I2
Model 19.25 3 0.0002 0.1 84.4%
Residual 6.77 7 0.45 0.00 0%
Total 26.02 10 0.0037
Regression coefficients
B SE −95% CI +95% CI Z P Beta
Constant −0.37 0.11 −0.6 −0.14 −3.18 0.0015 0.0
Similarity: body areas addressed 0.17 0.06 0.06 0.28 2.98 0.0028 0.62
Similarity: information about treatment effectiveness provided to participants −0.33 0.14 −0.61 −0.05 −2.34 0.0195 −0.54
Similarity: application mode −0.06 0.06 −0.18 0.06 −1.04 0.2984 −0.25
Method of moments random effects variance component
v = 0.04

Means and variance of the similarity ratings included in the model are provided, having a possible range of −2 (different for all studies) to 2 (similar across all studies).