Table 4.
Research | Analyzed Chemokines | Sample | Brain Region | Method | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fillman et al. (2013) [47] | CXCL8 (IL-8) | 20 SZ vs. 20 HS | DLPFC (BA 46) | RT–PCR | ↓ |
Fillman et al. (2014) [48] | CXCL8 | 35 SZ vs. 35 HS vs. 35 BD | Middle frontal gyrus | RT–PCR | ↓ |
Volk et al. (2015) [49] | CXCL8 | 62 SZ vs. 62 HS | Prefrontal cortex (BA 9) | RT–PCR | – |
Pandey et al. (2018) [50] | CXCL8 | 31 SZ vs. 24 HS | Prefrontal cortex (BA 9) | Western blot and RT–PCR | ↓ (protein levels) – (mRNA levels) |
Purves-Tyson et al. (2021) [51] | CXCL8 | 28 SZ vs. 29 HS | Substantia nigra | RT–PCR | – |
Zhu Y. et al. (2022) [52] | CCL2, CXCL8 | 72 SZ vs. 69 HS | DLPFC (BA 46) | RT–PCR |
CCL2↑ CXCL8 ↓ |
Zhu et al. (2022) [53] | CXCL8 | 35 SZ vs. 35 HS | Ventral midbrain | RT–PCR | – |
Childers et al. (2022) [54] | CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL8, CCL2 | Two RNAseq datasets used: PolyA: 183 HS vs. 168 SZ; RiboZ: 194 HS vs. 142 SZ; | DLPFC | Reanalysis of RNAseq datasets | ↑ in the Type 2 SZ subgroup (proinflammatory). |
Nakatani et al. (2006) [55] | CCL3 | 7 SZ vs. 7 HS | DLPFC (BA 46) | RT–PCR | ↓ |
Schmitt et al. (2010) [56] | CCL2, CCL3, CCL8, CXCL8 | 10 SZ vs. 10 HS | Superior temporal cortex (BA 22) | Microarray | ↓ |
Hill et al. (2021) [57] | CX3CL1 | 35 SZ vs. 35 HS | DLPFC | Western blot and ddPCR | ↓ (protein levels) – (mRNA levels) |
Weissleder et al. (2020) [58] | CXCL12 | 33 SZ vs. 32 BD vs. 33 HS | Subependymal zone and caudate nucleus | RT–PCR | ↓ |
Toritsuka et al. (2013) [59] | CXCL12 | 18 SZ vs. 18 HS | Olfactory neuronal layer | Microarray | ↓ |
Gandal et al. (2018) [60] | Numerous CC, CXC, C, and CX3C chemokines | 159 SZ vs. 293 HS | Cerebral cortex | Meta- analysis of microarray data |
CCL3, CCL4, CXCL12, CXCL14, and CX3CL1 ↓ CCL23 ↑ |
Abbreviations: BA—Brodmann area, BD—bipolar disorder, ddPCR—droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, DLPFC—dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, HS—healthy subjects, SZ—schizophrenia patients, RT–PCR—reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, ↑—statistically significantly increased level, ↓—statistically significantly decreased level, “–”—not significant changes.