Rietdijk 2020.
Study characteristics | ||
Country / Income of the Country | Australia (HIC) | |
Objective of study | Quote: "Acceptability of telehealth delivery of communication skills training. The research questions relating to acceptability, which are the focus of the present paper, were: 1. Are there differences between telehealth participants and in‐person participants in quantitative measures of acceptability of the social communication skills intervention TBIconneCT? 2. What are the perspectives of people with TBI and their carers regarding acceptability of TBIconneCT telehealth delivery?" | |
participant´s description | Thirty‐six patients (23 metropolitan and 13 regional) and their caregivers. Fourteen patients/caregivers received in‐person services, and 15 telerehabilitation | |
Health condition | Brain injury | |
Mode of rehabilitation delivery | Telerehabilitation | |
Type of rehabilitation provided | Communication | |
Study design / Data collection approach / Data analysis approach | Mixed methods study/ Skype interview, telephone interview or written questionnaires/ Thematic analysis | |
Funding sources for the study / Conflict of interest | Quote:''The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial sup port for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by a grant from icare NSW and an Australian Postgraduate Award'' Quote:''The authors declared the following potential conflicts ofinterest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or pub lication of this article: R.R., E.P., M.A. and L.T. are authors of the published training manual for the intervention reported in this paper. The authors do not receive royalties from purchases of this manual'' |
|
Notes | Study purposively sampled |