Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;14:758. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36450-y

Fig. 2. Opposing phenotypes of flies expressing hh versus hhR/A or hhR/E under endogenous promotor control.

Fig. 2

a Quantification of the numbers of ommatidia per eye in female flies. Hh biofunction in eye disks of flies homozygous for transgenic hh (in hh[KO;hh]/hh[KO;hh] flies) is increased over that in w1118 or heterozygous controls. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. n = 10 for each genotype, F = 13.6. Error bars represent standard deviation. ***p ≤ 0.0004. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. b Inset: Hh produced in the posterior compartment of the wing disc directly patterns the L3-L4 intervein area (orange) and indirectly patterns the L2-L3 intervein area (green). Quantification of L3-L4/L2-L3 intervein areas revealed significantly increased patterning activities of transgenic Hh. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t-test (two-tailed). n = 13 wings for w1118 and n = 27 for hh[KO;hh]/hh[KO;hh], ****p < 0.0001. L1-5 indicate the five longitudinal Drosophila wing veins. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. c Segment phenotype changes in hh[KO;hhR/A]/hh[KO;hhR/A] larvae resemble those in sfl/sfl larvae that are deficient in HS biosynthesis, and hh[KO;hhR/E]/hh[KO;hhR/E] larvae resemble hhAC/hhAC larvae that lack hh expression. Segment phenotypes were consistently observed in three independent crosses. Scale bar: 100 μm. c′ Schematic of the self-reinforcing Hh/Wg signaling loop at one of the 14 parasegment boundaries in Drosophila embryos. Due to Hh/Wg interdependency to maintain the loop, depletion of either morphogen will result in embryos that lack a naked cuticle. d Transgenic hh and both hh variants restore eye development in flies homozygous for impaired endogenous hh expression specifically in the eye (hhbar3/hhbar3). This demonstrates the largely retained bioactivity of both Hh variants in this system. Scale bar: 100 μm. e Quantification of the numbers of ommatidia per eye of female flies as shown in (d). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. n = 8 for hhbar3/hhbar3, n = 10 for hhbar3/+ and hh[KO;hh]/hhbar3, and n = 30 for hh[KO;hhR/A]/hhbar3 or hh[KO;hhR/E]/hhbar3. Error bars represent standard deviation. F = 357. ****p ≤ 0.0001, ns: p = 0.99. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.