Table 19.
AHP weight results.
Matrix | LiFi Capacity | WiFi Capacity | LiFi CDT | Occurrence Rate | Occupation Rate | Normalized Principal Eigenvector 100% | Weights | Values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LiFi capacity | 1 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 2/9 | 59.28% | 0.5928 | Consistency Ratio CR: | 9.1% |
WiFi capacity | 1/5 | 1 | 4/9 | 2 1/4 | 3 3/5 | 11.07% | 0.1107 | GCI: | 0.33 |
LiFi CDT | 1/7 | 2 1/4 | 1 | 3 4/5 | 7 2/7 | 19.68% | 0.1968 | EVM Check | 1.2 × 10−09 |
Occurrence rate | 1/7 | 4/9 | 1/4 | 1 | 1 2/7 | 5.52% | 0.0552 | α | 0.1 |
Occupation rate | 1/6 | 2/7 | 1/7 | 7/9 | 1 | 4.45% | 0.0445 | AHP-S* | 77.8% |
Consistency Ratio (CR), Geometric Consistency Index (GCI), Earned Value Management (EVM), AHP consensus indicator: (AHP-S*), Mean relative Error (MRE), and Lambada (Alonson/Lambada). Note: In this work, we used a linear scale. |
SUM = 100% | SUM = 1 | Lambda | 5.410 | |||||
Eigenvalue | 5.40995468 | ||||||||
Error: | 1.0 × 10−08 | ||||||||
Iterations | 7.0 × 10+00 |