Simplicity and cost
|
Simple and cost effective. |
Simple and cost effective, however creating a co-culture requires more effort and experience than a mono-culture. |
Requires specialized exposure equipment and a certain level of expertise. |
Requires specialized exposure equipment and a certain level of expertise; creating a co-culture requires more effort and experience than a mono-culture. |
Predictivity (Sensitivity and Specificity)
|
Good correlation with in vivo found [190]. Found to be more sensitive than ALI in several studies [214,216]. Accurate ranking found [208,209]. |
Combination of immune cell and epithelial cell more predictive than epithelial cell alone [94]. Accurate ranking found [213]. |
Generally good for primary cells. Lower predictivity of epithelial cell lines. ALI exposures found more sensitive than submerged in several studies [210,211,212]. |
Co-cultures perform better than two cell types separately [94]. BMDL of this model comes closer to the in vivo BMDL compared to submerged [211]. |
Robustness
|
Large inter-laboratory variability for THP-1 cells [100,108], no inter-laboratory data on other cell types. |
Not assessed for NMs specifically. |
Low reproducibility but similar trends between labs [195]. Low reproducibility improved after protocol optimizations [196]. |
Low reproducibility but similar trends between labs [195]. |
Compatibility
|
NMs may interfere with ELISA [99,118]. |
NMs may interfere with ELISA [99,118]. |
Compatible with a wide range of materials, including hydrophobic and low-density NMs. However, NMs may interfere with ELISA [99,118]. |
Compatible with a wide range of materials, as exposures do not necessarily require a dispersion. However, NMs may interfere with ELISA. Might be more suitable for NMs released form NEPs. |
Readiness
|
No NM-specific standardized protocol available. |
No NM-specific standardized protocol available. |
No NM-specific standardized protocol available. |
No NM-specific standardized protocol available. |