Table 2.
Comparison of the efficiency of the 3D PLA catalyst with different results in the literature.
| Row # | Catalyst | Substrate | Time (min) |
Temperature (K) |
Conversion (%) |
Ref # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fe63Cr5Nb4Y6B22 | MB | 20 | 70 | 100 | 39 |
| 2 | Fe(II)–PLA impregnated stirred caps | MB | 20 | 25 | 100 | 15 |
| 3 | Fe(II)–3D-printed PLA | MB | 30 | 25 | 100 | Our work |
| 4 | Fenton | BTH | 60 | 25 | 20 | 37 |
| 5 | Photo-Fenton | BTH | 60 | 25 | 80 | 37 |
| 6 | Fe(II)–3D-printed PLA | BTH | 200 | 25 | 100 | Our work |
| 7 | Photo-Fenton | Resorcinol | 120–240 | 25 | 100 | 40 |
| 8 | Fe(II)–3D-printed PLA | Resorcinol | 120 | 25 | 100 | Our work |