Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;44(4):1779–1792. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26174

TABLE 4.

Comparison of segmentation performance of the proposed method and the methods of the top‐4 ranked teams on the 13 validation infant MRI images of iSeg‐2019

Method (Top 5) CSF GM WM AVG
DICE MHD ASD DICE MHD ASD DICE MHD ASD DICE MHD ASD
Brain_Tech 0.961 8.873 0.108 0.928 5.724 0.300 0.911 7.114 0.347 0.933 7.237 0.252
FightAutism 0.960 9.233 0.110 0.929 5.678 0.300 0.911 6.678 0.341 0.933 7.196 0.250
OxfordIBME 0.960 8.560 0.112 0.927 5.495 0.307 0.907 6.759 0.353 0.931 6.938 0.257
QL111111 0.959 9.484 0.114 0.926 5.601 0.307 0.908 7.028 0.353 0.931 7.371 0.258
Proposed 0.961 9.293 0.107 0.931 5.741 0.292 0.912 7.111 0.332 0.935 7.382 0.244

Note: The best values are highlighted in bold font.