Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;44(4):1779–1792. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26174

TABLE 5.

Ablation study performed by comparing the segmentation accuracy in different groups g by two‐fold cross validation

g CSF GM WM AVG Number of parameters
DICE MHD DICE MHD DICE MHD DICE MHD
2 0.953 ± 0.008 0.258 ± 0.023 0.921 ± 0.007 0.605 ± 0.045 0.905 ± 0.013 0.455 ± 0.040 0.926 ± 0.007 0.439 ± 0.033 3,907,593
3 0.952 ± 0.008 0.258 ± 0.022 0.921 ± 0.007 0.606 ± 0.046 0.905 ± 0.014 0.456 ± 0.042 0.926 ± 0.007 0.440 ± 0.033 4,861,949
4 0.952 ± 0.008 0.260 ± 0.022 0.920 ± .007 0.608 ± 0.045 0.905 ± 0.013 0.457 ± 0.040 0.926 ± 0.007 0.442 ± 0.033 5,642,547

Note: The best values are highlighted in bold font.