Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;44(4):1779–1792. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26174

TABLE 7.

Component analysis of MixACB by two‐fold cross validation

CSF GM WM AVG
DICE MHD DICE MHD DICE MHD DICE MHD
CONV_3 0.951 ± 0.008 0.261 ± 0.021 0.922 ± 0.007 0.605 ± 0.046 0.907 ± 0.015 0.452 ± 0.041 0.927 ± 0.007 0.439 ± 0.032
AC_3 0.952 ± 0.010 0.261 ± 0.024 0.922 ± 0.008 0.604 ± 0.045 0.906 ± 0.014 0.453 ± 0.041 0.927 ± 0.008 0.440 ± 0.033
CONV_5 0.947 ± 0.012 0.276 ± 0.023 0.918 ± 0.008 0.619 ± 0.047 0.903 ± 0.016 0.463 ± 0.043 0.922 ± 0.008 0.453 ± 0.034
AC_5 0.952 ± 0.008 0.261 ± 0.022 0.920 ± 0.008 0.610 ± 0.046 0.904 ± 0.016 0.460 ± 0.043 0.925 ± 0.008 0.443 ± 0.033
MixACB 0.953 ± 0.008 0.254 ± 0.022 0.923 ± 0.007 0.601 ± 0.047 0.907 ± 0.015 0.452 ± 0.043 0.928 ± 0.008 0.436 ± 0.034

Note: The best values are highlighted in bold font. “CONV_3” denotes that the 3D convolution with a kernel size of 3; “AC_3” denotes that the 3D‐AC with a kernel size of 3; “CONV_5” denotes that the 3D convolution with a kernel size of 5; “AC_5” denotes that the 3D‐AC with a kernel size of 5.