Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 11;22:27. doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02030-4

Table 3.

Biofilm characterization

Strain Biomass (mg) Cell density (Log CFU mL−1) eDNA (µg mg−1) Proteins (µg mg−1) EPS (µg mg−1)
L. plantarum C5 11.30 ± 1.70b 9.22 ± 0.27a 1.93 ± 0.38a 6.87 ± 1.27a 80.11 ± 16.98a
L. plantarum POM1 36.20 ± 12.02a 10.13 ± 0.22a 0.62 ± 0.10ab 1.72 ± 0.36a 26.11 ± 1.12b
L. plantarum 1LS16 34.70 ± 4.81ab 9.28 ± 0.15a 0.66 ± 0.24ab 2.33 ± 0.06a 22.44 ± 0.58b
L. plantarum D3.15 24.15 ± 5.59ab 9.40 ± 0.24a 1.03 ± 0.21ab 3.50 ± 0.16a 38.07 ± 5.00ab
L. plantarum OE1 16.35 ± 9.40ab 9.54 ± 0.48a 1.16 ± 0.22ab 4.77 ± 0.03a 44.11 ± 10.84ab
L. plantarum D2.6 30.85 ± 0.49ab 9.56 ± 0.02a 0.86 ± 0.34ab 2.66 ± 0.02a 35.00 ± 1.64b
L. plantarum E3.8 34.50 ± 1.70ab 9.55 ± 0.35a 0.75 ± 0.02ab 2.45 ± 0.06a 25.08 ± 4.79b
Lact. paracasei 41j 26.80 ± 4.81ab 9.44 ± 0.04a 0.59 ± 0.18b 3.28 ± 0.39a 17.91 ± 20.87b

Biomass (mg), cell density (Log CFU mL−1), and ECMs (eDNA, proteins, and exopolysaccharide concentration, expressed as µg/mg of the total biomass) characterization of the newly formed biofilm, and reported as mean ± standard deviation [a–b Means within the columns with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)]