Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 10;23:59. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02814-7

Table 3.

Multiple regression analysis for postoperative ICL vault prediction in the development dataset

Combination of variables Pearson’s correlation coefficient P-value for correlation MAE (µm) Bayesian information criterion

Development set (self-validation)

(N = 696)

Selection from STAAR nomogram - ICL size, WTW, ACD 0.516 < 0.001 109.8 6891.4
Selection from KS formula – ICL size, ATA (= ACA distance) 0.427 < 0.001 118.3 6961.0
Forward stepwise selection – age, mean K, ICL size, ICL power, CCT, AQD, ACA distance, LT 0.636 < 0.001 101.7 6789.2
Backward stepwise selection – age, toric lens, SE, mean K, ICL size, AQD, ACA distance, LT, WTW 0.608 < 0.001 98.3 6810.1
Partial least squares – age, sex, toric lens, mean K, ICL size, ICL power, CCT, AQD, ACV, LT, ACA distance, pupil diameter, WTW 0.664 < 0.001 96.9 6801.3
LASSO – ICL size, AQD, ACA distance, LT 0.607 < 0.001 101.8 5769.9

Validation set

(N = 196)

Selection from STAAR nomogram - ICL size, WTW, ACD 0.505 < 0.001 112.3 1917.2
Selection from KS formula – ICL size, ATA (= ACA distance) 0.473 < 0.001 116.9 1920.6
Forward stepwise selection – age, mean K, ICL size, ICL power, CCT, AQD, ACA distance, LT 0.580 < 0.001 104.9 1917.5
Backward stepwise selection – age, toric lens, SE, mean K, ICL size, AQD, ACA distance, LT, WTW 0.578 < 0.001 105.7 1927.6
Partial least squares – age, sex, toric lens, mean K, ICL size, ICL power, CCT, AQD, ACV, LT, ACA distance, pupil diameter, WTW 0.577 < 0.001 105.8 1935.1
LASSO – ICL size, AQD, ACA distance, LT 0.582 < 0.001 104.7 1894.9

ACA anterior chamber angle, ACV anterior chamber volume, AQD aqueous depth, ATA angle-to-angle distance, CCT central corneal thickness, LASSO least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, LT lens thickness, MAE mean squared error, SE spherical equivalent, WTW white-to-white distance