Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5;11(6):478–486. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent endoscopic reintervention following EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Patient characteristics n=33, n (%)
Median age, years (IQR) 72 (67–76)
Sex (male/female) 22 (66.7)/11 (33.3)
ECOG performance status (0/1/2) 15 (45.5)/15 (45.5)/3 (9.1)
Underlying malignancy
 Gastric cancer 9 (27.3)
 Bile duct cancer 9 (27.3)
 Pancreatic cancer 8 (24.2)
 Hepatocellular carcinoma 3 (9.1)
 Others 4 (12.1)
Location of MBO
 Distal MBO/proximal MBO 18 (54.5)/15 (45.5)
Duodenal stent placement 6 (18.2)
Indication for EUS-HGS
 Failure of duodenal scope insertion 11 (33.3)
 Surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy 10 (30.3)
 Failure of biliary cannulation 12 (36.4)
Procedural details of EUS-HGS
 Procedure time (min), median (IQR) 27 (20–40)
 Type of L-PCMS
  Stent diameter (8 mm/10 mm) 26 (78.8)/7 (21.2)
  Stent length (10 cm/12 cm) 26 (78.8)/7 (21.2)
  Intragastric stent length, median (IQR) 5 (5.2–5.8)
Time to RBO after EUS-HGS (days), median (IQR) 104 (56–263)

ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EUS-HGS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy; IQR: Interquartile range; L-PCMS: Long partially covered metal stent; MBO: Malignant biliary obstruction; RBO: Recurrent biliary obstruction