Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5;11(6):478–486. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029

Table 2.

Outcomes of endoscopic reintervention following EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Outcome measure n=33, n (%)
Cause of RBO after EUS-HGS
 Food impaction or sludge formation 19 (57.6)
  Distal MBO/proximal MBO 11 (33.3)/8 (24.2)
 Hyperplasia at uncovered stent part 9 (27.3)
  Distal MBO/proximal MBO 7 (21.2)/2 (13.3)
 Additional biliary stricture 5 (15.2)
  Distal MBO/proximal MBO 0 (0)/5 (15.2)
Technical success 33 (100)
Clinical success 27 (81.8)
 Distal MBO/proximal MBO 17 (94.4)/10 (66.7)
Procedure time, median (IQR) 35 (29–50)
Type of endoscope
 Gastroscope/duodenoscope/echoendoscope 5 (15.2)/27 (81.8)/1 (3.0)
Location of guidewire and catheter insertion
 Distal end of the existing HGS stent 20 (60.6)
 Stent mesh of the existing HGS stent 10 (30.3)
 HGS fistula after removal of the HGS stent 3 (9.1)
Reintervention method
 Stent cleaning 5 (15.2)
 Additional HGS stent placement 20 (60.6)
 Antegrade stent placement 5 (15.2)
 Additional HGS and antegrade stent placement 3 (9.1)
Adverse events
 Liver abscess 1 (3.0)

HGS: Hepaticogastrostomy; EUS-HGS: EUS-guided HGS; IQR: Interquartile range; MBO: Malignant biliary obstruction; RBO: Recurrent biliary obstruction