Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 30;11(6):458–465. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-22-00026

Table 3.

Secondary outcomes

Outcome Number of studies Number of patients Odds ratio (95% CI), P Within-group heterogeneity (I2)
Diagnostic accuracy
 Overall 5 FNB + ROSE: 912
FNB: 917
2.49 (1.08-5.73)
0.03
74%
 End-cutting needles 2 FNB + ROSE: 630
FNB: 465
0.71 (0.29-3.61)
0.56
16%
 Reverse bevel needles 3 FNB + ROSE: 282
FNB: 452
3.24 (1.19-8.82)
0.02
25%
 Diagnostic sensitivity 3 FNB + ROSE: 899
FNB: 907
1.94 (0.84-4.49)
0.12
77%

Outcome Number of studies Number of patients Mean difference (95% CI), P Within-group heterogeneity (I2)

Number of needle passes 5 FNB + ROSE: 758
FNB: 851
0.07 (−0.22-0.37)
0.62
79%

FNB: Fine-needle biopsy; ROSE: Rapid on-site evaluation, CI: Confidence interval