Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 11;128(8):1548–1558. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02156-7

Table 2.

Self-report measures* (mean [SD]), at baseline and follow-up (3 months and 6 months post screening) with statistical tests to assess if differences in changes between women offered NHS Breast Screening Programme and BC-Predict (N = 662).

Women offered NHS Breast Screening Programme Women offered BC-Predict
Baseline
(n = 304)
3 months
(n = 222)
6 months
(n = 213)
Baseline
(n = 358)
3 months
(n = 289)
6 months
(n = 260)
Differences between groups at 3 months: test statistics (with P values) Differences between groups at 6 months: test statistics (with P values)
Comparative risk perceptions 3.08 (0.75), n = 299

3.07 (0.75),

n = 222

3.12 (0.75), n = 213 2.91 (0.80), n = 355 3.04 (0.92), n = 288 3.08 (0.95), n = 259 F(1, 502) = 1.207, P = 0.273

F(1, 464) = 1.019,

P = 0.313

State anxiety

10.20 (3.80),

n = 301

10.56 (3.84), n = 221 11.10 (4.19), n = 211

10.06 (3.67),

n = 355

10.35 (3.81), n = 288 10.54 (3.77), n = 260 F(1, 502) = 0.017, P = 0.896

F(1, 462) = 1.314,

P = 0.252

State anxiety (cases) 46 (15.3%) 41 (18.6%) 42 (19.9%) 45 (12.7%) 39 (13.5%) 42 (16.2%) Χ2 (1) = 1.01, P = 0.314 Χ2 (1) = 0.76, P = 0.384
Cancer worry 12.50 (3.20), n = 300 12.09 (2.97), n = 222 12.24 (3.03), n = 213 12.00 (3.02), n = 355 11.97 (2.94), n = 289 11.85 (3.04), n = 259

F(1, 504) = 1.467,

P = 0.226

F(1, 465) = 0.418,

P = 0.518

Screening knowledge 6.62 (1.44), n = 295 6.83 (1.53), n = 209 6.92 (1.57), n = 354 7.09 (1.55), n = 256 F(1, 456) = 1.207, P = 0.273
Attitudes towards screening 14.26 (1.37), n = 298 14.43 (1.09), n = 212 14.18 (1.35), n = 354 14.52 (1.00), n = 254

F(1, 458) = 1.049,

P = 0.306

Intentions towards screening 4.50 (1.22), n = 298 4.74 (0.90), n = 222 4.54 (1.21), n = 213 4.45 (1.28), n = 355 4.68 (1.00), n = 288 4.55 (1.21), n = 259 F(1, 502) = 0.075, n = 0.785 F(1, 465) = 0.072, P = 0.788

*Higher scores indicate greater levels of each variable, i.e., higher perceived comparative risk, more state anxiety, more cancer worry, higher screening knowledge, more positive attitudes and higher levels of intentions.

Logistic regression used rather than ANCOVA, as outcome variable dichotomous.