Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 6;10:1–11. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2023.2492

Supplementary Table 5.

- Total time dedicated to training (in minutes) by each healthcare professional

REMS mean (SD) DXA mean (SD) REMS - DXA mean (p-value)
Professional figure Most conservat ive scenario (L) Base-case scenario (M) Least conservati ve scenario (H) Most conserva tive scenario (L) Base-case scenario (M) Least conserva tive scenario (H) Most conservati ve scenario (L) Base-case scenario (M) Least conservati ve scenario (H)
Clinician 158.1 (405.2) 307.3 (811.9) 1,105.4 (3,282.3) 592.0 (1,323.2) 848 (1,760.9) 1,081.0 (2,179.9) -433.9 (n.s.) -540.7 (n.s.) 24.4 (n.s)
Nurse 3.5 (9.0) 5 (13.2) 53.1 (133.1) 16.0 (26.3) 24 (42.0) 31.0 (59.0) -12.5 (n.s.) -19.0 (n.s.) 22.1 (n.s)
Radiology technician 9.2 (22.5) 31.5 (64.3) 46.2 (95.4) 747.0 (1361.5) 1,078 (1,866.2) 1,949 (2,642.4) -737.8 (n.s.) -1,046.5 (n.s.) -1902.8 (0.016)
Resident 120 (415.0) 271.5 (824.0) 572.3 (1,652.6) 16.0 (38.6) 84 (152.8) 133.0 (234.3) 104.0 (n.s.) 187.5 (n.s.) 439.3 (n.s)
Other healthcare personnel 0.0 (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 73.8 (266.3) 6.0 (19.0) 12 (37.9) 36.0 (113.8) -6.0 (n.s.) -12.0 (n.s.) 37.8 (n.s)
All professionals 290.8 (815.9) 615.4 (1624.4) 1,850.8 (4,894.1) 1,377.0 (2643.9) 2,046.0 (3546.7) 3,230.0 (4,445.7) -1,086.2 (n.s.) -1,430.6 (n.s.) -1,379.2 (n.s)

Note. n.s.: not significant. Since the p-value is also affected by the sample size (the smaller the sample size, the higher the p- value), we should be careful in interpreting the lack of statistical significance of the difference in estimates (as it may be driven by the low number of observations)