Table 4. .
The results of logistic mixed-effect models for Experiments 1 and 2 for the memory probe data
| Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Est. error | 95% CI | Estimate | Est. error | 95% CI | |||
| Int | 3.63* | 0.33 | 3.03 | 4.32 | 1.98* | 0.24 | 1.52 | 2.46 |
| Scr1 versus Int | 0.37 | 0.86 | −0.94 | 2.44 | −0.19 | 0.22 | −0.62 | 0.27 |
| Scr3 versus Int | −0.02 | 0.74 | −1.19 | 1.76 | 0.11 | 0.27 | −0.39 | 0.70 |
| Scr5 versus Int | −0.39 | 0.59 | −1.39 | 0.94 | −0.27 | 0.24 | −0.71 | 0.22 |
| Scr7 versus Int | −0.45 | 0.61 | −1.50 | 0.87 | – | – | – | – |
| ScrLowPMI versus Int | – | – | – | – | −0.64* | 0.23 | −1.07 | −0.16 |
| Words versus Int | −1.74* | 0.38 | −2.51 | −1.01 | −0.30* | 0.17 | −0.64 | 0.04 |
| Nonwords versus Int | −2.35* | 0.33 | −3.04 | −1.75 | – | – | – | – |
Stimulus type was dummy-coded with Intact sentences as the reference level. Int — intact, Scr — scrambled, PMI — pointwise mutual information.
Denotes significant difference.