Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan;141(Suppl 1):S40–S50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1026H

TABLE 2.

Exposure to Smoking in Cars in California in 2011 and Nonsmokers’ Intention to Smoke in the Next Year, Logistic Regression

Factor Model 1 Model 2
n = 23 394 n = 21 716
aOR 95% CI aOR 95% CI
SHS exposure in cars, d
 0 Ref Ref
 1–2 2.27 1.86 to 2.76*** 1.54 1.25 to 1.90***
 3–7 3.03 2.31 to 3.99*** 1.92 1.53 to 2.41***
Sex
 Female Ref Ref
 Male 1.08 0.94 to 1.23 1.08 0.94 to 1.25
Grade level
 Sixth Ref Ref
 Seventh 1.97 0.95 to 4.09 1.97 0.92 to 4.22
 Eighth 3.29 1.57 to 6.90** 3.45 1.62 to 7.35**
 Ninth 3.21 1.55 to 6.63** 3.22 1.54 to 6.74**
 10th 2.83 1.38 to 5.83** 2.90 1.39 to 6.05**
 11th 3.38 1.63 to 7.01** 3.50 1.67 to 7.36**
 12th 4.12 2.01 to 8.47*** 4.20 2.02 to 8.76***
Race and/or ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic Ref Ref
 African American, non-Hispanic 0.74 0.56 to 0.98* 0.60 0.46 to 0.79***
 Hispanic and/or Latino 1.48 1.28 to 1.71*** 1.54 1.33 to 1.79***
 Asian American, non-Hispanic 0.86 0.67 to 1.11 0.86 0.65 to 1.13
 NH and/or PI, non-Hispanic 1.12 0.67 to 1.85 1.04 0.61 to 1.78
SHS in same room 1.69 1.37 to 2.08***
SHS in home 0.77 0.54 to 1.08
Live with smoker 1.72 1.41 to 2.11***

All data presented are weighted to adjust for differential nonresponse and selection. All analyses in Models 1 and 2 were controlled for sex, grade level, and race and/or ethnicity. Model 2 further controlled for SHS in the same room, SHS in the home, and living with a smoker. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; NH, native Hawaiian; PI, Pacific Islander; —, not applicable.

*

P < .05 level; **P < .01; ***P < .001.